fse-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to fse-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceValidates electronic invoices (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD, Factur-X, Peppol BIS, etc.) against authority-pinned rules and explains failures.2137 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable clients to look up DDEX ERN 3.8.2 structure, element and attribute semantics, documented child sequences, AVS values, and step-by-step composition guides. It also performs offline XSD validation of ERN XML and package checks for delivery conventions such as BatchComplete, relative URLs, DeliveryType, and message MD5.1012 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local stdio MCP server that lets agents validate Brazilian health identifiers (CPF, CNS, CNES), look up RNDS CodeSystems and ValueSets, and check FHIR Bundles against packaged codes and references. Everything runs offline with no network calls or authentication against the RNDS.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to look up how specific v2 fields, datatypes, and table codes translate to R4, and to convert whole ORM, ADT, and ORU messages into transaction Bundles with explicit warnings for unmapped values.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides FHIR resource validation, synthetic test fixture generation, and HIPAA-safe logging review as MCP tools for AI agents.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceTranslates HL7 v2.x messages to FHIR R4, validates against profiles like US Core, and explains errors in natural language for AI agents.48 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: validation of a document, explanation of an error string, generation of a sample document, and terminology lookup. The possible overlap between validation and error explanation is resolved because explain_schematron_error takes an error message or rule id rather than a document.
All tool names use consistent snake_case verb_noun phrasing: validate_cda, explain_schematron_error, generate_sample_cda, and lookup_code. The pattern is predictable and readable.
The set is narrowly scoped to FSE 2.0 CDA2 validation and assistance, so four tools is reasonable. Each tool covers a distinct and useful part of the workflow without redundant operations.
The core local workflow is covered: validate a CDA, explain validation errors, generate a synthetic starting document, and look up terminology codes. Minor gaps remain, such as listing supported document types or catalog metadata and batch validation, but agents can generally work around these.