Skip to main content
Glama
masoudroot
by masoudroot

Related Servers

Alternatives to obper-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI hosts to check text for grammar, spelling, and style errors, measure readability, and generate tone-adjusted rewrites through structured tool calls. Every tool returns predictable, typed output for reliable routing and results.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes 43 writing tools to any MCP-capable agent host, enabling clarifying questions, outline generation, drafting, revision, anti-AI audit, reader profiling, and export as one guided workflow. It learns the user's voice from their tracked edits and can distill a project directory into reports, READMEs, or blog posts based on the user's style.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables automated agents and writers to check Norwegian and English prose before sending, returning concrete style findings, revision hints, and verdicts instead of authorship claims, with a no-judgment band, positive quality checks, a private local mode, and phrase-bank memory.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables detection and elimination of AI slop in text, providing tools to analyze writing for overused phrases, structural issues, and verbosity, and offers human writing rules tailored to context.
      3
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Sub-15ms edge intelligence tools for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and LLM agent loops. Provides sub-millisecond LLM JSON repair, web-to-markdown token compression (cuts context tokens up to 90%), PII redaction, and RFC 5322 B2B email deliverability verification at zero marginal token cost.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The three rule-building tools (rule_pack, deep_rules, smart_rules) overlap heavily — all produce editing checklists for Persian text, and the distinctions (compact vs full vs diagnostic-driven) are subtle enough that an agent could easily misselect. Similarly, search, ruling, and rule_pack all query the same vault, with boundaries explained only in prose. The mechanical_pass/verify_regression/diff_report trio is more clearly separated by their distinct gate/ledger roles.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case with no camelCase mixing, which is a solid baseline. However, the pattern shifts between verb_noun (read_note, map_vault, verify_regression, diff_report) and bare noun/verb forms (search, reindex, ruling), so the convention is mostly but not fully predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Eleven tools is a reasonable scope for a Persian editing pipeline plus vault access. It is slightly heavy given that three of them (rule_pack, deep_rules, smart_rules) occupy nearly the same slot, suggesting some consolidation is possible, but nothing is wildly out of range.

    Completeness4/5

    The editing pipeline is well-covered end to end: diagnose (smart_rules), fix (mechanical_pass), verify (verify_regression), and audit (diff_report), plus vault access via search/read_note/map_vault/reindex. The vault side is read-only with no note creation or update, but that may be intentional if notes are authored elsewhere, so the gap is minor.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues