Skip to main content
Glama

memser — Memory-as-a-Service MCP Server

An MCP server that exposes memory operations (store, recall, forget, consolidate, list) as tools, backed by a tiered storage engine, so any MCP-compatible agent (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, a Telegram bot, custom agents) can plug in for persistent memory.

Layers

MCP Interface Layer (app/server.py)     store_memory, recall_memory,
                                         forget_memory, list_memories,
                                         consolidate_memories
Memory Engine (app/memory_engine.py,    scoring, dedup, conflict
app/consolidation.py, app/scoring.py)   detection, decay scheduling
Storage Tiers
  - Working   (Redis, TTL)              app/redis_client.py
  - Episodic  (Postgres, JSONB-ish)     app/models.py (tier="episodic")
  - Semantic  (Postgres + pgvector)     app/models.py (tier="semantic")
Background Jobs (APScheduler)           app/jobs.py

Related MCP server: aimemory

Setup

cp .env.example .env          # adjust as needed
docker compose up -d          # Postgres+pgvector and Redis
pip install -e ".[dev]"       # or: pip install -r requirements.txt

# Only needed if not using docker-compose's auto-init:
python -m scripts.init_db

python -m app.server          # runs the MCP server over stdio

To try it with the MCP inspector instead of a real client:

mcp dev app/server.py

To wire it into Claude Desktop/Code, add to its MCP config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memory-service": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "app.server"],
      "cwd": "/path/to/memser",
      "env": { "DATABASE_URL": "...", "REDIS_URL": "...", "OPENAI_API_KEY": "..." }
    }
  }
}

Without OPENAI_API_KEY, embeddings fall back to a deterministic local hash embedder (app/embeddings.py::HashEmbedder) — the server runs fully offline, but recall quality is lexical-overlap-only, not real semantic search. Consolidation summarization similarly falls back to naive dedup/join instead of an LLM call.

Tools

Tool

Purpose

store_memory(content, scope, tags?, source?, ttl_seconds?, actor?)

Write a memory. ttl_seconds → working tier (Redis); omitted → durable episodic tier (Postgres), with dedup/conflict resolution against existing memories in scope.

recall_memory(query, scope, k?, tags?, actor?)

Hybrid search: working tier + vector similarity over episodic/semantic, ranked by similarity + recency + frequency + confidence.

forget_memory(scope, memory_id?, tier?, tags?, actor?)

Cascading delete across Redis + Postgres, with an audit-log snapshot written before deletion.

consolidate_memories(scope, actor?)

Clusters episodic memories, LLM-summarizes each cluster into a semantic fact, marks originals superseded_by (kept, not deleted). Also runs on a schedule.

list_memories(scope, tier?, tags?, ...)

Audit/debug listing, no ranking.

scope is the tenancy boundary (user id, agent id, or session id) — nothing crosses scopes. Every tool call is written to memory_audit_log (action, actor, memory id, scope, detail).

Data model

See db/init.sql for the authoritative schema (memories, memory_audit_log) and app/models.py for the SQLAlchemy mapping. Key points:

  • memories.embedding is VECTOR(1536) (pgvector), indexed with an ivfflat cosine-distance index.

  • superseded_by chains episodic → semantic (via consolidation) and old-fact → new-fact (via conflict resolution) without ever deleting the superseded row — that's the audit trail.

  • forget_memory is the only thing that actually deletes rows, and it logs a full content snapshot to memory_audit_log first.

Key mechanisms

  • Conflict detection (app/memory_engine.py): before a durable store, the new embedding is compared against the scope's active memories. Above DUPLICATE_THRESHOLD cosine similarity, the write is treated as a duplicate (bumps access_count/confidence on the existing row instead of inserting). Above CONFLICT_THRESHOLD but below duplicate, the new memory is inserted and the older, similar ones are marked superseded_by the new row.

  • Consolidation (app/consolidation.py): greedy single-linkage clustering of a scope's episodic memories by cosine similarity, one LLM summarization call per cluster, one new semantic row per cluster, originals marked superseded (not deleted).

  • Scoring/decay (app/scoring.py): recall ranks by similarity, recency (exponential half-life), frequency (diminishing returns on access_count), confidence, weighted per .env. A background decay job (app/jobs.py::run_decay_sweep) shrinks confidence on stale, unaccessed episodic memories over time.

  • Scoped forgetting: forget_memory always requires a scope, and cascades to every tier a memory could live in (Redis working entry + Postgres row), logging who deleted what and when before the row is gone.

Background jobs

app/jobs.py runs two APScheduler interval jobs inside the same process as the MCP server (started/stopped via the FastMCP lifespan hook in app/server.py):

  • run_consolidation_sweep — every CONSOLIDATION_INTERVAL_MINUTES, consolidates every scope with at least CONSOLIDATION_MIN_EPISODIC un-consolidated episodic memories.

  • run_decay_sweep — every DECAY_INTERVAL_MINUTES, decays confidence on episodic memories untouched for DECAY_AFTER_DAYS.

Set ENABLE_SCHEDULER=false to disable both (e.g. run consolidation only via explicit consolidate_memories calls, or move this to Celery beat for a multi-process deployment — the job bodies are plain async functions and don't depend on APScheduler specifically).

Tests

pytest

Tests cover the pure logic (scoring math, hash-embedding determinism, clustering, summarization fallback) and don't require Postgres/Redis to be running. There's no integration test suite against a live database in this scaffold — add one with a pgvector/pgvector test container if you extend this.

Known scaffold limitations

  • cluster_by_similarity is O(n²) greedy single-linkage — fine for per-scope batches of tens–low-hundreds of episodic memories between consolidation runs; swap in a real clustering/ANN approach if scopes grow much larger before consolidating.

  • Conflict resolution always lets the newest similar memory supersede the older one(s); there's no merge-vs-flag-for-human-review path — add one if blind "newest wins" isn't safe for your use case.

  • Single-process scheduler (APScheduler) — fine for one server instance; move to Celery beat (as sketched in the original architecture doc) if you run multiple replicas and need a single consolidation/decay owner.

A
license - permissive license
-
quality - not tested
C
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Gives AI agents persistent memory with semantic search, automatic extraction, and memory decay, accessible via MCP protocol.
    7
    MIT
  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides persistent, searchable memory for MCP-compatible agents, enabling recall by meaning, automatic decay, trust scoring, and cross-agent handoffs.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides persistent memory with semantic search for MCP-based AI agents, enabling them to store and recall information across sessions using vector embeddings.
    4
    1
    MIT

View all related MCP servers

Related MCP Connectors

  • User-owned memory for AI agents, Copilot, Claude, IDEs, CLIs, and chat apps over remote MCP.

  • Cross-vendor AI memory over MCP. One semantic store, readable and writeable from every MCP client.

  • Private-by-default, local-first memory/context/task orchestrator for MCP apps and agents.

View all MCP Connectors

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/masikgit/memser'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server