connectServer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description is the sole source of behavioral info. It lacks details on side effects, permission requirements, connection validation steps, or behavior if server already exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, 17 words, achieves conciseness but at the expense of critical details. It is not overly verbose but fails to earn its place by providing necessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks output description, no return value info. With 3 parameters and 0% schema coverage, the description leaves significant gaps about functionality and results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet description adds no explanation for the three parameters (serverUrl, serverName, validateConnection). No insight into their purpose or usage beyond schema types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool connects to a new agent server and adds it to the proxy's server list. Specific verb 'connects' and resource 'agent server' distinguish it from siblings like disconnectServer and callAgent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not describe prerequisites, when to avoid, or compare with other agents management tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.