typesafe-screening-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to typesafe-screening-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables prototyping, running, and evaluating typed judgment questions against TypeSafe's Jev model, including accuracy, calibration, and threshold analysis.31MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to call TypeSafe's JEV classifier and receive structured, typed judgments with probabilities for binary, choice, and scoring questions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLM-assisted biomedical literature screening and structured extraction from PubMed alerts, PMIDs, DOIs, and GEO accessions, with full-text retrieval and multi-provider LLM support.74 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables frontier coding agents to delegate routine probabilistic judgments to TypeSafe Jev, providing calibrated triage signals for failures, attempts, completion, context ranking, findings, risk, and generic evidence-grounded questions.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural-language interaction with TypeSafe's Jev decision API, supporting mixed question calls, batch evaluation, model listing, and confidence or composite-score gates over stdio.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to get fast, calibrated probabilistic answers from Jev (Typesafe AI) to yes/no, scale, or choice questions about provided material, without using a generative model.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a distinct input path: search-then-screen, screen specific PMIDs, and screen arbitrary non-PubMed records. screen_pmids and screen_records are similar in action but clearly separated by input type, so an agent can select correctly with the descriptions.
Tools follow a mostly consistent verb-first snake_case pattern (screen_pmids, screen_records), with search_and_screen as the one oddity using a compound verb form. The naming is predictable and readable despite this minor deviation.
Three tools is a well-scoped set for a narrow screening workflow: one search+screening tool and two variants for different input sources. Each tool earns its place and there is no bloat.
The tools cover the full screening pipeline: searching PubMed, screening known PMIDs, and screening external records. A minor gap is the lack of a raw article/metadata retrieval tool, but it is not essential for the stated screening purpose.