Skip to main content
Glama
marwansaab

obsidian-modified-mcp-server

by marwansaab

Related Servers

Alternatives to obsidian-modified-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Obsidian that exposes tools for reading/writing notes, managing frontmatter and tags, querying Tasks, semantic search, and interacting with Obsidian Bases, with shared local caching and support for various runtime modes.
      39
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A standalone Node MCP server that provides semantic search, knowledge graph, and vault editing over an Obsidian vault. It runs locally as a single stdio process without requiring an Obsidian plugin for core functionality.
      18
      80 npm
      10
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Headless semantic MCP server for Obsidian, Logseq, Dendron, Foam, and any markdown folder. Features built-in hybrid semantic search, surgical AST editing, template scaffolding, zero-config local embeddings, and workflow tracking.
      5
      56 npm
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and operation: file reading/writing, search with different query types, vault graph analysis, commands, and periodic notes. The descriptions clearly differentiate similar-looking tools like search, complex_search, pattern_search, and semantic_search.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case convention with a verb-noun structure (put_content, get_file_contents, delete_file, list_tags). Even compound names like batch_get_file_contents and find_and_replace fit the pattern, and search variants share a common suffix.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 32 tools, the server exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15) and enters the 'too many' category (25+). While each tool is distinct, the sheer number could overwhelm agents, and some tools could be parameterized to reduce count.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers CRUD, search (keyword, regex, semantic, JsonLogic), graph analysis, periodic notes, tags, and command execution. Minor gaps include rename/move operations and explicit folder creation, but the core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues