get_booking_details
Retrieve reservation details for a specific booking by providing its booking ID.
Instructions
Get details about a specific booking.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bookingId | Yes | Booking ID |
Retrieve reservation details for a specific booking by providing its booking ID.
Get details about a specific booking.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bookingId | Yes | Booking ID |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It doesn't disclose whether the operation is read-only, what error occurs for invalid IDs, or what data is returned. For a retrieval tool, the read-only nature is implied but not stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence with no waste. The purpose is front-loaded, though more context could be added without verbosity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter retrieval tool with no annotations or output schema, the description is minimal. It lacks details on return format, error handling, and differentiation from list_all_bookings.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents the single required bookingId parameter. The description adds no parameter information beyond the schema baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a clear verb (get) and resource (booking details) for a specific booking. It does not differentiate from list_all_bookings, but the singular 'specific booking' implies a single-record lookup.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this versus list_all_bookings or other siblings. The agent must infer usage from the tool name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.