Skip to main content
Glama
martinbechard

MCP Agent Operations

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Agent Operations

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Lightweight MCP server that exposes tools for system information and weather lookup, designed for agent integration via stdio.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server that gives AI agents safe access to your local dev environment: filesystem, databases, processes, and OpenAPI specs.
      15
      28 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight, stdio-based MCP server enabling AI assistants to perform local file system operations like reading, writing, searching, and executing commands.
      2,360 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Agent-optimized MCP server that replaces built-in file, search, exec, and git tools with compact, structured JSON equivalents. Benchmarked 20–45% token savings for AI coding agents.
      20
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, especially within the claims cluster where verbs like acquire, extend, release, and status differentiate them. No two tools seem to perform the same action, though the many claim-related tools could require careful reading.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming convention is consistent within each domain (claim_*, skill_*, render_hierarchy_*, verify_*) but mixes noun_verb (claim_acquire) and verb_noun (create_hierarchy_plan) patterns across the server. This inconsistency could make tool naming less predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 25 tools, the count is at the high end and feels heavy for an MCP server. The multiple domains justify some breadth, but the set could likely be consolidated without losing clarity.

    Completeness3/5

    Claims have strong lifecycle coverage, but other areas have gaps: hierarchy plans have no delete operation, skills only support read/load/validate without creation or removal, and references only load/refresh. Some obvious operations are missing, making the surface incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues