getMyPlaylists

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must explain behavior. It only states 'current user's playlists' but omits pagination limits, required scopes, and response structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, straightforward sentence that delivers the core purpose without any extraneous words. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema and no annotations, leaving the description as the sole context. It fails to mention that the result is an array of playlist objects or how the limit parameter affects paging, making it insufficient for agents needing detailed context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides full documentation for the single 'limit' parameter, including type, min, max, and description. Since the schema coverage is 100%, the description does not need to add parameter details, and it adds none, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'Get', the resource 'list of playlists', and the scope 'current user's', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like getPlaylist (singular). It unambiguously states what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not mention alternatives or when to choose this over getPlaylist, so an agent receives no selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.