cybersecurity-vuln-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cybersecurity-vuln-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceUnifies NVD, EPSS, CISA KEV, GitHub Advisory, and OSV into a single MCP server, enabling AI agents to query vulnerability intelligence conversationally with 23 tools for incident response, prioritization, dependency audits, and threat monitoring.41348 npm29MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the NIST National Vulnerability Database — lets AI assistants search CVEs by keyword, severity, CPE, CWE, KEV status, and date range via natural language.2GPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search, correlate, and monitor real-time vulnerability intelligence from NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, and MITRE ATT&CK, including CVE details, critical CVE tracking, known exploited vulnerabilities, and exploitation probability scores.52MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceUnified vulnerability search MCP server for penetration testing agents, integrating 5 data sources (NVD, OSV, EPSS, CISA KEV, Exploit-DB+GitHub) and 10 MCP tools for CVE query, keyword search, batch query, EPSS scoring, KEV checking, exploit search, and comprehensive assessment with Chinese output.2-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for vulnerability management that provides tools for automated severity and CWE classification using NLP models. It enables AI agents to query the Vulnerability Lookup API for detailed CVE information and search for security vulnerabilities across various sources.1642AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides real-time vulnerability intelligence including CVE lookup, EPSS exploit probability, and CISA KEV status from free APIs, enabling AI assistants to prioritize CVEs by real-world risk.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Tools are mostly distinct, with slight overlap between vuln_kev_due_soon and vuln_kev_latest (both KEV-focused but different filters) and between vuln_trending and vuln_epss_top (different criteria for prioritizing CVEs). Descriptions clarify differences.
All tool names follow the pattern vuln_<descriptive_name>, using underscores and consistent noun/verb structure. No mixing of conventions.
7 tools cover the core vulnerability intelligence domain without being excessive. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is well-scoped.
The surface covers search, lookup, trending, exploitation probability, and KEV monitoring comprehensively. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool for patch or fix version information, but overall the set is complete for its informational purpose.