MCP Refactoring
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP_REFACTORING_PYTHON_COMMAND | No | Path to the Python backend command (molting) | |
| MCP_REFACTORING_PYTHON_ENABLED | No | Enable or disable the Python backend |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_refactoringsA | List available refactorings with their parameter contracts. Returns the catalog of available refactorings from all enabled backends, optionally filtered by language and/or category. Args: language: Filter by language (e.g., 'python'). If not specified, returns all. category: Filter by Fowler category (e.g., 'composing_methods') Returns: TOON-formatted string containing refactoring specifications. Categories: - composing_methods: Extract/inline methods, variables - moving_features: Move methods/fields between classes - organizing_data: Encapsulation, type codes - simplifying_conditionals: Guard clauses, polymorphism - simplifying_method_calls: Rename, add/remove parameters - dealing_with_generalization: Pull up/push down, inheritance |
| preview_refactoringA | Preview what changes a refactoring would make without applying them. This is a dry-run mode that shows the diff of what would change, without actually modifying any files. Always preview before applying. Args: refactoring: Name of the refactoring (e.g., 'extract-method') target: Target in language-native format (e.g., 'src/order.py::Order::calculate#L10-L15') params: Refactoring-specific parameters (e.g., {'name': 'calculate_tax'}) Returns: TOON-formatted string with preview results including diff. Example: preview_refactoring( refactoring="extract-method", target="src/order.py::Order::calculate#L10-L15", params={"name": "calculate_tax"} ) |
| apply_refactoringA | Apply a refactoring to the codebase. This actually modifies files. Use preview_refactoring first to see what changes will be made. Changes can be reverted with git. Args: refactoring: Name of the refactoring (e.g., 'extract-method') target: Target in language-native format (e.g., 'src/order.py::Order::calculate#L10-L15') params: Refactoring-specific parameters Returns: TOON-formatted string with results of the applied refactoring. Example: apply_refactoring( refactoring="rename-method", target="src/order.py::Order::calc_total", params={"new_name": "calculate_total"} ) |
| inspect_structureA | Get structural information about code (classes, methods, line numbers). Inspects a file to return information about its structure. Use this to understand the code before applying refactorings. Args: path: File path to inspect (e.g., 'src/order.py') depth: Level of detail - 'file', 'class', or 'method' (default: 'class') Returns: TOON-formatted string with structural information. Example: inspect_structure(path="src/order.py", depth="method") |
| analyze_codeA | Analyze code for smells and suggest refactorings. Detects code smells like long methods, large classes, feature envy, and suggests appropriate refactorings to address them. Note: This feature requires backend support. Returns backend_supported: false for backends that don't implement analysis yet. Args: path: File or directory path to analyze smells: Optional list of smell types to check for (e.g., ['long-method', 'large-class', 'feature-envy']) Returns: TOON-formatted string with analysis results. Supported smell types (when backend supports analysis): - long-method: Method exceeds line threshold - large-class: Class has too many responsibilities - feature-envy: Method uses another class's data excessively - data-clumps: Same data items appear together repeatedly - primitive-obsession: Overuse of primitives instead of objects - duplicate-code: Similar code in multiple locations |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: analyzing code smells, inspecting structure, listing available refactorings, previewing changes, and applying refactorings. No overlap in functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., analyze_code, preview_refactoring). No mixing of conventions.
Five tools is well-scoped for a refactoring server, covering analysis, inspection, listing, preview, and application without unnecessary tools.
The toolset covers the main refactoring workflow: analysis, preview, and application. Missing a dedicated undo tool, but git revert is suggested. Minor gap but acceptable.