clio-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to clio-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects Claude to Clio practice management, enabling AI-assisted access to matters, contacts, documents, tasks, and billing with audit logging and encryption for law firm compliance.299 npm25MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables secure access to legal documents from Clio via Claude Desktop, with local processing and semantic search to ground AI responses in actual documents.11 npm29Mozilla Public 2.0
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA standalone MCP server that enables Claude Desktop to manage Clio legal practice matters, documents, billing, and more via ~46 tools, with secure OAuth and audit logging.46-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude (or any MCP client) to read and write Clio Manage data—contacts, matters, activities—directly from chat, with flat-fee billing support in one call.-
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude to access and manage your law firm's MyCase account, including cases, clients, tasks, invoices, and more.1001MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects Claude to MyCase legal practice management, enabling natural language queries for cases, contacts, calendar, billing, and more.55 npm5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 55 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, with clear separation between matter, contact, document, billing, time, task, and calendar operations. A few areas overlap (document creation/upload/write variants, time entry vs. timer vs. activity update), but descriptions provide enough detail to choose correctly.
The dominant pattern is clio_<resource>_<action> in snake_case (e.g., clio_matter_get, clio_task_create), applied consistently across most domains. Minor deviations exist, such as clio_activity_update for time entries, clio_who_am_i, clio_describe_api, and clio_outstanding_balances.
55 tools is heavy and well above the ideal 3–15 range, risking agent overload and selection difficulty. The breadth of Clio Manage justifies many tools, but the set could likely be consolidated (especially document and lookup tools).
Core create/read/update coverage is strong across matters, contacts, documents, time, tasks, calendars, notes, and billing. However, delete/removal operations are absent for nearly every resource and DELETE is explicitly disallowed, leaving lifecycle gaps that agents cannot work around.