Skip to main content
Glama
Malja MCP

Malja MCP

Official

Get metadata

get_metadata
Read-only

Describe connected data providers, including datasets, metrics, attribution, and terms, so you can learn what data exists before querying.

Instructions

Describe the connected data providers: datasets served, metrics available, attribution and terms. Call this to learn what data exists before querying.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_metadata"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
localeNoLanguage of the human-readable text output: "en" (default) or "ar" (Modern Standard Arabic, right-to-left). Structured JSON fields, ISO3 codes and dataset ids stay in English either way.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
providersYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.8.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  2. First observedv0.7.0

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is known. The description adds that results include attribution and terms of use, which is useful behavioral context, but says nothing about freshness, caching, or whether the provider list is static or live.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences: what it returns first, then the call condition. No filler and nothing buried.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

One optional parameter with a fully documented schema, an output schema covering return shape, and annotations covering safety. Nothing an agent needs in order to invoke this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single locale parameter has 100% schema description coverage, including enum values and the note that structured fields stay in English. The description adds no parameter guidance, which is acceptable given the schema does the work, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Describe the connected data providers" names a specific verb and resource, and the follow-on clause enumerates the content returned (datasets, metrics, attribution, terms). It implies a discovery role distinct from the data-query siblings, though it never names one explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Call this to learn what data exists before querying" gives a concrete usage context and sequencing relative to the query tools. It stops short of stating when not to call it or naming a specific alternative, but the condition is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.