etsy_view_cart
Retrieve the current items in your Etsy shopping cart to review details and prepare for checkout.
Instructions
View the current contents of the Etsy shopping cart.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the current items in your Etsy shopping cart to review details and prepare for checkout.
View the current contents of the Etsy shopping cart.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only implies a read-only operation ('View') and gives no details about side effects, authentication requirements, session state, or whether the operation can fail. This is a meaningful gap for a tool interacting with cart state.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, focused sentence with no filler. It states the purpose directly and is easy to scan.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
This is a simple no-parameter read operation, so the description is mostly adequate for invocation. However, with no output schema and no annotations, the agent is not told what response shape to expect or whether authentication is required. For a tool this simple, this is a minor but real gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters and the schema is fully covered. With no parameters, there is nothing for the description to add; the baseline of 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('View') and the resource ('current contents of the Etsy shopping cart'). It is immediately distinguishable from sibling tools like etsy_add_to_cart or etsy_checkout.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The usage context is implied: an agent would call this to inspect the cart, likely before checkout or before adding items. However, there is no explicit guidance about when to use this versus alternatives, no exclusions, and no mention of prerequisites like login.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/markswendsen-code/mcp-etsy'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server