logout
Clear your Costco.com session and remove stored cookies to end your shopping session securely.
Instructions
Clear Costco session and stored cookies
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Clear your Costco.com session and remove stored cookies to end your shopping session securely.
Clear Costco session and stored cookies
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It states the tool clears session and cookies, which implies a destructive action, but does not disclose behavioral traits like whether this logs out all devices, requires re-authentication, or affects other tools. More context on the impact would be helpful.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the core action and resource, making it highly concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (0 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is adequate but could be more complete. It lacks details on behavioral outcomes (e.g., what happens after logout) or error cases, which would enhance agent understanding in this context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description appropriately does not discuss parameters, earning a baseline score of 4 for this context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific action ('Clear') and target resources ('Costco session and stored cookies'), distinguishing it from siblings like login or status. It precisely communicates what the tool does without being tautological.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage context (ending a session) but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like simply closing the browser. It clearly distinguishes from siblings like login, but lacks explicit when-not or alternative guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/markswendsen-code/mcp-costco'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server