Skip to main content
Glama
markomitranic

Data Visualization MCP Server

visualize_data

Create data visualizations using Vega-Lite specifications to transform complex datasets into clear graphical representations for better analysis and understanding.

Instructions

A tool which allows you to produce a data visualization using the Vega-Lite grammar. When to use this tool:

  • At times, it will be advantageous to provide the user with a visual representation of some data, rather than just a textual representation.

  • This tool is particularly useful when the data is complex or has many dimensions, making it difficult to understand in a tabular format. It is not useful for singular data points. How to use this tool:

  • Prior to visualization, data must be saved to a named table using the save_data tool.

  • After saving the data, use this tool to visualize the data by providing the name of the table with the saved data and a Vega-Lite specification.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
data_nameYesThe name of the data table to visualize
vegalite_specificationYesThe vegalite v5 specification for the visualization. Do not include the data field, as this will be added automatically.

Implementation Reference

  • The core handler logic for the 'visualize_data' tool. It retrieves saved data by name, injects it into the provided Vega-Lite specification, and returns either a base64-encoded PNG image or a text artifact with the spec.
    elif name == "visualize_data":
        data_name = arguments["data_name"]
        vegalite_specification = eval(arguments["vegalite_specification"])
        data = saved_data[data_name]
        vegalite_specification["data"] = {"values": data}
    
        if output_type == "png":
            png = vlc.vegalite_to_png(vl_spec=vegalite_specification, scale=2)
            png = base64.b64encode(png).decode("utf-8")
            return [types.ImageContent(type="image", data=png, mimeType="image/png")]
        else:
            return [
                types.TextContent(
                    type="text",
                    text=f"Visualized data from table {data_name} with provided spec.",
                    artifact=vegalite_specification,
                )
            ]
  • Registration of the 'visualize_data' tool in the list_tools() handler, defining its name, description, and input schema.
    types.Tool(
        name="visualize_data",
        description=VISUALIZE_DATA_TOOL_DESCRIPTION,
        inputSchema={
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "data_name": {
                    "type": "string",
                    "description": "The name of the data table to visualize",
                },
                "vegalite_specification": {
                    "type": "string",
                    "description": "The vegalite v5 specification for the visualization. Do not include the data field, as this will be added automatically.",
                },
            },
            "required": ["data_name", "vegalite_specification"],
        },
    ),
  • Input schema for the 'visualize_data' tool, specifying required parameters: data_name (string) and vegalite_specification (string).
    inputSchema={
        "type": "object",
        "properties": {
            "data_name": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "The name of the data table to visualize",
            },
            "vegalite_specification": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "The vegalite v5 specification for the visualization. Do not include the data field, as this will be added automatically.",
            },
        },
        "required": ["data_name", "vegalite_specification"],
    },
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It effectively describes key behavioral traits: it requires data to be saved first (a prerequisite), specifies that Vega-Lite v5 is used, and notes that the data field is automatically added (avoiding duplication). However, it lacks details on error handling, output format, or performance considerations, which would be helpful for a visualization tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and appropriately sized: it starts with a clear purpose statement, followed by bullet-pointed sections for usage guidelines and instructions. Each sentence adds value without redundancy, and the information is front-loaded for quick understanding. The format is efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (visualization with Vega-Lite), no annotations, and no output schema, the description does a good job of covering essential context: purpose, usage scenarios, prerequisites, and basic parameter semantics. However, it lacks details on what the visualization output looks like (e.g., image format, display method) and error cases, which would improve completeness for an agent invoking this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters thoroughly. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema: it mentions that data_name refers to 'the name of the table with the saved data' and vegalite_specification is 'a Vega-Lite specification,' but these are largely redundant with schema descriptions. No additional syntax, examples, or constraints are provided, meeting the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'produce a data visualization using the Vega-Lite grammar.' It specifies the verb ('produce') and resource ('data visualization'), but does not explicitly differentiate from its sibling tool 'save_data' beyond mentioning it as a prerequisite. The purpose is specific and actionable, though sibling differentiation is only implied through workflow dependency.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit usage guidelines in a structured format: 'When to use this tool' lists scenarios (visual representation for complex/multi-dimensional data, not for singular data points) and 'How to use this tool' outlines prerequisites (save data first with save_data) and steps. It clearly distinguishes when to use this tool versus alternatives by stating it's not useful for singular data points and requires prior data saving.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/markomitranic/mcp-vegalite-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server