Motion MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Motion MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, and more via the Model Context Protocol, integrating with LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Motion tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, and recurring tasks through natural-language conversation via the Model Context Protocol.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables managing tasks, projects, schedules, users, comments, and more in Motion via natural language through the Model Context Protocol.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, enabling natural language task, project, and schedule management.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via the Model Context Protocol, so you can manage tasks, search projects, check your schedule, and more — all through natural conversation.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural-language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, comments, custom fields, and more, bridging Motion's API to LLM clients via MCP.10Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Motion resource (tasks, projects, users, etc.) with no overlapping functionality. The purposes are clearly separated, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool.
All tool names follow a uniform 'motion_<resource>' pattern using plural nouns (e.g., motion_tasks, motion_projects). This consistent convention aids predictability and agent navigation.
With 10 tools covering the core entities of a project management system (tasks, projects, users, workspaces, etc.), the count is well-scoped. Each tool earns its place, and the surface is neither sparse nor bloated.
The tool set covers most CRUD operations for tasks, projects, recurring tasks, custom fields, and comments. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no update for projects or recurring tasks), but these are workable for typical agent workflows.