Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Selenix-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude direct control of a real browser via Playwright, enabling AI-driven web testing, autonomous test execution, and live failure analysis through natural language.
      8
      7,781 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local browser automation MCP server for Claude Code, enabling navigation, clicking, typing, and inspecting real web pages via Google Chrome.
      20 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server gives Claude Code a real browser to navigate, click, type, screenshot, and test web applications from the terminal. It supports multi-step scenarios, assertions, session recording, visual regression, and console/network monitoring.
      106 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Code a real browser to navigate, click, type, screenshot, and inspect pages via accessibility snapshots. It also runs multi-step test scenarios with assertions, session recording, visual regression, and console/network monitoring from the terminal.
      106 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Code a real browser for navigation, interaction, screenshots, and end-to-end testing, including assertions, session recording, visual regression, and console/network monitoring.
      106 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, such as 'add_commands' for adding commands versus 'clear_and_replace_commands' for replacing all commands. However, some overlap exists between 'get_current_test' and 'get_test_by_name', as both retrieve test details, which could cause minor confusion. Overall, the descriptions help clarify boundaries, but the duplication in test retrieval tools slightly reduces clarity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as 'add_commands', 'get_active_suite', and 'run_test'. All tools use snake_case without deviation, making them predictable and easy to parse. This consistency enhances usability and reduces cognitive load for agents.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a Selenium automation domain, covering test management, command operations, and debugging. It provides comprehensive functionality without feeling overly bloated. A minor reduction could improve focus, but the scope justifies most tools.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set offers complete coverage for Selenium test automation, including CRUD operations for commands (add, clear, fix), test retrieval and execution (get, run), and debugging features (logs, screenshots, HTML analysis). No obvious gaps exist; agents can manage the full test lifecycle from creation to analysis seamlessly.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing