Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to stellar-pulse-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Stellar that enables AI assistants to explain account holdings, diagnose transaction failures, and describe Soroban contracts in plain language, with optional payment proposal flow.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts like Cursor and Claude to query StellarExpert's public Open API for directory entries, asset information, and ledger helper data through exposed tools.
      12
      1 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query Keel's Stellar liquidity risk engine for executable order-book and AMM depth, maximum safe collateral sizes, asset risk bands, flags, and historical readings, with ledger and methodology provenance on every answer. All tools are read-only, so agents can assess collateral and trade depth without signing or submitting transactions.
      9
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes 17 read-only tools from six XRPL-Utilities services so AI agents can access XRPL wallet analysis, signal feeds, macro telemetry, permissioned asset stacks, RWA tracking, and ETF flow data.
      41
      33 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents read-only, keyless access to Aster DEX data, including futures and spot markets, TradFi perpetuals, funding rates, order books, klines, vault deposit flows, and account views through MCP tools.
      13
      42 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct Stellar domain area: network status, single asset details, ranked asset list, DEX order book, account overview, and DeFi TVL. The only potential overlap, stellar_asset vs stellar_top_assets, is clearly separated by single-asset lookup versus ranked discovery. An agent can confidently select the right tool from the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent snake_case pattern with the same stellar_ prefix and descriptive noun phrases. There is no mixing of camelCase, vague verbs, or alternative naming conventions. The set reads as a cohesive namespace.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal range for a focused Stellar analytics server. Each tool covers a distinct data surface, and none feels redundant or tacked on. The scope is narrow enough that six tools fully express the server's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core Stellar pulse workflows: network conditions, asset discovery and verification, DEX liquidity, account state, and DeFi TVL. Minor gaps remain around transaction-level lookup, historical trends, and Soroban/contract data, but these are workarounds rather than dead ends for the stated monitoring purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues