No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
The tools are mostly distinct: rule_text retrieves paragraph text, light retrieves light definitions, and evaluate_display computes lawful displays. The main overlap is between applied_entries and evaluate_display, since both take the same input and both report applicable entries, but the descriptions clearly separate the cheaper applicability query from the full display evaluation.
The names are readable and domain-specific, but they do not follow a consistent pattern: evaluate_display is verb_noun, applied_entries and rule_text are noun phrases, and light is a bare noun. There is no strong predictable convention across the set.
Four tools is well-scoped for the server's narrow purpose of evaluating COLREGS Part C lights. Each tool has a distinct role in the workflow: evaluate displays, check applicable entries, look up rule text, and look up light definitions.
The core workflow is covered: a fact record can be evaluated, applicable entries identified, and supporting rule text and light definitions retrieved. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to introspect the available fact schema or enumerate all rule cites and light ids, but these are workable from the response data.