rundeck_list_webhooks
List all webhooks configured in a specified Rundeck project to manage event-driven integrations.
Instructions
List all webhooks configured in a project
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | Yes | Project name |
List all webhooks configured in a specified Rundeck project to manage event-driven integrations.
List all webhooks configured in a project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | Yes | Project name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description implies a read operation. It does not disclose any additional behavioral details such as pagination, permissions, or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise and efficient. One sentence with no wasted words, clearly stating the action and scope.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks details about what the response contains. It is not incomplete but could be richer.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only one parameter 'project' with schema description 'Project name'. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'List all webhooks configured in a project' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like rundeck_list_jobs, rundeck_list_executions, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives. The description is minimal and does not provide exclusions or context for choosing this tool over similar list tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mariomorenodev/rundeck-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server