Skip to main content
Glama
mario-hernandez

google-search-console-mcp-claude-code

README.md
# ⚠️ This repo has been superseded

This MCP has been **unified with the GA4 MCP** into a single comprehensive Google SEO suite — including five **cross-platform tools** that connect Search Console with Analytics 4 (GSC↔GA4 journey, opportunity matrix, traffic health check, revenue attribution, full landing page diagnosis).

## 👉 New repo: [`google-seo-mcp-claude-code`](https://github.com/mario-hernandez/google-seo-mcp-claude-code)

The new MCP includes everything this one did (with prefixed `gsc_*` tool names) plus the five cross-platform tools that are only possible with unified auth.

## Migration

```bash
pipx uninstall gsc-seo-mcp
pipx install git+https://github.com/mario-hernandez/google-seo-mcp-claude-code
```

Update your Claude config from `gsc-seo-mcp` to `google-seo-mcp`.

Tool names are prefixed in the new MCP:
- `quick_wins` → `gsc_quick_wins`
- `traffic_drops` → `gsc_traffic_drops`
- `content_decay` → `gsc_content_decay`
- (etc.)

This repo is kept for historical reference only and is no longer maintained.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 14 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct concept: alerts for regressions, cannibalization for competing pages, content_decay for declining pages, etc. No two tools have overlapping purposes; descriptions clearly differentiate them.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names use lowercase with underscores. While some are verb_noun (get_capabilities, inspect_url) and others are noun phrases (alerts, cannibalization, content_decay), the pattern is consistent and readable, with minimal deviation.

Tool Count5/5

14 tools is well-scoped for a Search Console server. It covers analytics, diagnostics, management, and specialized insights without being overwhelming or too thin.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers core Search Console operations: analytics (search_analytics, site_snapshot), diagnostics (inspect_url, list_sitemaps), and specialized insights (alerts, cannibalization, etc.). Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for managing users or viewing all errors), but the set is comprehensive for its focus.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues