printer_resume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. It does disclose a key behavioral trait: the operation requires confirm=true, which signals a confirmation gate. However, it does not describe error behavior, reversibility, or consequences of calling with confirm=false, leaving some behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no filler. The main purpose is front-loaded, and the parameter requirement is stated directly. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one optional-looking parameter and no output schema, the description provides the two essential facts: what the tool does and what the caller must supply. It does not cover edge cases such as calling it on a non-paused printer, but the tool's simplicity makes the description mostly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema only defines confirm as a boolean with default false and no description. The description adds crucial semantics by stating 'Requires confirm=true,' telling the agent the exact value needed for the call. This compensates for the 0% schema description coverage, though it does not explain the meaning of the confirmation beyond the requirement.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Resume a paused print.' This clearly identifies the tool's function and distinguishes it from sibling tools like printer_pause and printer_stop. The addition of 'Requires confirm=true' further clarifies the intended action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool: when a print is paused and needs to be resumed. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives such as printer_status or printer_doctor. The confirm requirement is a usage constraint, but the broader context of choosing this tool over siblings is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.