Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mq-bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turn PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite or Snowflake into MCP tools and a REST API, with API keys and per-table role-based access.
      8
      163
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server with 32 tools for ETL ingestion, AI-generated data quality rules, AI transformations, vector search, and natural-language SQL. Works across Postgres, MongoDB, Kafka, S3/MinIO, HashiCorp Vault, and five vector stores (Qdrant, Weaviate, Milvus, Chroma, pgvector).
      12
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying and mutating data across multiple sources (CSV, Google Sheets, SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Oracle) through a dynamic GraphQL API, with flexible filtering, batching, persisted queries, and dynamic source switching.
      8
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor to discover and act on generated CRUD services over HTTP through tools like create, update, list, and delete, plus read-only resources for listing and fetching records by ID, with no extra glue code.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns any REST/OpenAPI, SOAP, GraphQL, OData, SQL, MongoDB or existing MCP system into MCP tools for Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot without writing an MCP server, shipping 474 ready-made connectors with runtime tool registration, field filtering and role-based access control.
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions (start/stop/wait routes, publish, describe, generate_cli_command). However list_routes, route_status, and bridge_status all overlap on reporting route health/throughput, differing mainly in scope (this server vs. all processes, one vs. all routes), which could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Conventions are mixed: verb_noun appears in list_routes, start_route, stop_route, wait_route, generate_cli_command, while noun_verb forms appear in route_status, route_messages, server_info, bridge_status, plus bare verbs like publish and describe. It's still readable but not a single predictable pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well-scoped for a message-bridge server: route lifecycle, message inspection, publishing, and introspection each earn their place without bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Route lifecycle is well covered (start, stop, wait, status, message capture, list, CLI generation) plus publish, describe, and identity info. Minor gaps exist, e.g. no explicit route teardown/purge beyond stop_route, but core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week