mq-bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to mq-bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceTurn PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite or Snowflake into MCP tools and a REST API, with API keys and per-table role-based access.8163MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA sovereign, high-speed, local-first Big Data Ingestion, Filtering, and Analytical Pipeline Orchestrator.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server with 32 tools for ETL ingestion, AI-generated data quality rules, AI transformations, vector search, and natural-language SQL. Works across Postgres, MongoDB, Kafka, S3/MinIO, HashiCorp Vault, and five vector stores (Qdrant, Weaviate, Milvus, Chroma, pgvector).12AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying and mutating data across multiple sources (CSV, Google Sheets, SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Oracle) through a dynamic GraphQL API, with flexible filtering, batching, persisted queries, and dynamic source switching.85 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLM clients such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor to discover and act on generated CRUD services over HTTP through tools like create, update, list, and delete, plus read-only resources for listing and fetching records by ID, with no extra glue code.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTurns any REST/OpenAPI, SOAP, GraphQL, OData, SQL, MongoDB or existing MCP system into MCP tools for Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot without writing an MCP server, shipping 474 ready-made connectors with runtime tool registration, field filtering and role-based access control.AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct actions (start/stop/wait routes, publish, describe, generate_cli_command). However list_routes, route_status, and bridge_status all overlap on reporting route health/throughput, differing mainly in scope (this server vs. all processes, one vs. all routes), which could cause misselection.
Conventions are mixed: verb_noun appears in list_routes, start_route, stop_route, wait_route, generate_cli_command, while noun_verb forms appear in route_status, route_messages, server_info, bridge_status, plus bare verbs like publish and describe. It's still readable but not a single predictable pattern.
11 tools is well-scoped for a message-bridge server: route lifecycle, message inspection, publishing, and introspection each earn their place without bloat or redundancy.
Route lifecycle is well covered (start, stop, wait, status, message capture, list, CLI generation) plus publish, describe, and identity info. Minor gaps exist, e.g. no explicit route teardown/purge beyond stop_route, but core workflows are complete.