Skip to main content
Glama
marcoldenburg

RGate MCP

by marcoldenburg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to RGate MCP

  • Webby MCP Server

    cordlesssteve
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    Not graded
    maintenance
    Provides comprehensive website validation across performance, accessibility, SEO, and security dimensions using multiple testing services including WebPageTest, Google PageSpeed Insights, Axe DevTools, Mozilla Observatory, and SSL Labs. Enables automated website health assessments through browser automation and API integrations.
    12
    3 npm
    1
    -

  • blop

    n2400813g
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP-native release confidence control plane that turns browser execution into auditable go/no-go decisions by combining business-critical journey context, evidence-heavy QA runs, and risk governance.
    28
    1
    MIT

  • websec-auditor

    sheiscypher
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Passive website security and trust auditor that checks for security, SEO, AI surface, email, and other exposures, producing a score and remediation plan.
    -
  • Prufa by prufa-dev

    Prufaofficial

    prufa-dev
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Point your coding agent at a URL and get a real-browser QA audit: broken signup/login/checkout flows, JS console errors, missing analytics, consent + security headers, mobile tap targets, and accessibility — returned as machine-verified findings graded A-F.
    44
    44 PyPI
    2
    Apache 2.0

Related Servers

  • LaunchTrust MCP

    mustafasalimerek-bit
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Scans public URLs for compliance and security issues such as leaked API keys, exposed files, missing privacy pages, and security headers, helping developers identify gaps before launch.
    MIT
  • io.github.spal-agentgrid/siteqa by spal-agentgrid

    io.github.spalofficial

    spal-agentgrid
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and CI systems to run deterministic website QA audits over MCP, with every finding backed by evidence and every result hashed and signed. It checks HTTP, TLS, security headers, SEO, links, accessibility, and robots.txt, with configurable pass/fail verdicts.
    MIT

  • ui-optimizer-mcp

    polatbakir
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI-driven UI inspection and optimization by scanning websites with configurable viewports, capturing screenshots, running deterministic accessibility and layout checks, and generating prioritized reports with fix prompts.
    2
    MIT

  • PureRank MCP Server

    vadimsv1
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to score drafts for AI-content-spam risk before publishing and scan entire sites, providing a pre-publish QA gate with pass/warn/fail verdicts.
    8 npm
    MIT

  • deploy-check

    fahmiwol
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables agents to verify that a deploy actually worked by checking pages, links, and comparing environments, catching blank 200 responses, broken links, stray noindex, and staging that never updated.
    3
    MIT
Deploy Server
Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Scored across 9 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct function: starting scans, polling results, comparing histories, exporting reports, generating fix plans, handling pricing and unlocks, and listing checks. No two tools overlap in purpose; descriptions clearly differentiate them.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase snake_case. Verbs like start, get, create, export, generate, compare, list, unlock are all imperative and paired with specific nouns.

Tool Count5/5

With 9 tools, the server covers the core scanning lifecycle without being bloated. Each tool serves a necessary role in the workflow: initiating, monitoring, analyzing, and monetizing scans.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the full scan workflow: start, poll, compare, export, fix generation, and payment. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to list or manage historical scans, but the core use cases are well supported.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources