Aplomo MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| aplomo_understand_repoA | Detect technologies and summarize modules and symbols in the repository. |
| aplomo_find_existing_patternsB | Search source code for existing implementations before adding an abstraction. |
| aplomo_review_planB | Check whether an implementation plan covers patterns, scope, compatibility, and validation. |
| aplomo_review_architectureA | Summarize architecture configuration and repository structure for an architecture review. |
| aplomo_review_diffB | Review the current git diff for risky size, secrets, and missing test changes. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct artifact such as repo overview, existing patterns, plan, architecture, or diff hole, but understand_repo and review_architecture both summarize repository structure and could be confused by an agent picking a general overview tool. Descriptions are specific enough to separate them in most cases.
All tools use the same aplomo_ prefix followed by a clear verb_noun pattern: understand_repo, find_existing_patterns, review_plan, review_architecture, review_diff. The naming convention is uniform and predictable.
Five tools is well-scoped for a repository understanding and review assistant. Each tool covers a necessary step without redundancy or bloat.
The tool surface supports a complete workflow: understand the repo, search for existing patterns, review a plan, review architecture, and review the diff. No critical gap is evident for the server's apparent purpose.