Skip to main content
Glama
marc-hanheide

PDF Redaction MCP Server

by marc-hanheide
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to PDF Redaction MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • redact-pdf-mcp

      dambuchs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to permanently remove personally identifiable information from PDF documents, returning redacted files with the sensitive text deleted rather than merely covered. Supports scanned documents, multiple languages, entity types, and optional human review.
      6
      40 npm
      MIT

    • doc-redactor

      agxhub
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a local-first MCP server for multi-format document redaction, enabling detection of sensitive content, physical removal from PDFs, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, and text files, and forensic audit with zero network calls.
      7
      AGPL 3.0

    • Nutrient Document Engine MCP

      PSPDFKit
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and users to process documents through natural language, supporting PDF operations like text extraction, redaction, splitting, form filling, annotations, and content search.
      42 npm
      62
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, well-defined purpose with no overlap. For example, load_pdf loads files, redact_text redacts text, redact_area redacts areas, save_redacted_pdf saves results, list_loaded_pdfs lists loaded files, list_applied_redactions tracks redactions, and close_pdf closes files. The descriptions clearly differentiate their functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., load_pdf, redact_text, save_redacted_pdf). This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand, with no deviations in naming conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the count is well-scoped for a PDF redaction server. It covers the full lifecycle from loading and redacting to saving and cleanup, with each tool serving a necessary function without bloat or redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for PDF redaction workflows. It includes loading (load_pdf), two redaction methods (redact_text and redact_area), saving (save_redacted_pdf), listing and tracking (list_loaded_pdfs and list_applied_redactions), and cleanup (close_pdf). No obvious gaps exist for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources