configure-wallet-skills

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description should clearly state whether this tool is read-only or has side effects. It says 'walks through which skills to run' but does not clarify if it executes the skills or merely prints instructions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences) and front-loaded: first sentence identifies it as Lesson 5, second explains the specific purpose. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description explains what the tool does, it lacks details on output format, prerequisites (e.g., completing previous lessons), and behavioral specifics. For an educational tool, it is minimally adequate but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, so the schema covers all. The description does not need to add parameter details, adequately handling the zero-parameter case.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as 'Lesson 5' and specifies its role as a walkthrough for configuring skills after adding the package. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by being a sequential lesson focused on setup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use: after running the add command and before running individual skills. However, it could be more explicit about when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.