sdd-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to sdd-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to search, retrieve, and validate portable SKILL.md files through skill resources and read-only tools.1MIT

craftbag-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts to discover, list, load, explain, and validate Agent Skills (SKILL.md) from project and home skill trees. Hosts can filter, rank, and load skills without depending on any one agent product.1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that unifies and synchronizes AI coding skills across multiple tools, exposing skill discovery and retrieval via list_skills and read_skill.13 npm14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes Cursor-style skill packs (SKILL.md trees) via MCP resources, tools, and prompts, enabling any MCP client to list, get, search skills, and retrieve skill context.314 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables centrally authoring and validating reusable agent guidance and delivering it across MCP-compatible hosts via registry resources, prompt templates, skill execution, and shared state.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to infer and resolve skills from text, normalize skill names, perform semantic taxonomy searches, and inspect lifecycle governance.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools target a clearly distinct stage or artifact (spec-init, spec-requirements, spec-design, spec-tasks, spec-approve, spec-impl). The main overlap is spec-status vs spec-feedback, both of which surface progress/status information, and the three validate_* tools differ only by target. Descriptions largely resolve these ambiguities.
The set mixes two conventions: snake_case (list_specs, get_skill, validate_spec, prepare_generation_context) and kebab-case (spec-init, spec-requirements, validate-design, validate-gap), plus a bare noun 'steering'. While the spec-* family is internally consistent, the overall pattern is unpredictable.
16 tools is borderline-heavy for a spec-driven-development server. Many serve a genuine lifecycle stage, but the validate_* trio and the status/feedback pair feel partially redundant, suggesting some tools could be consolidated.
The surface covers the full spec lifecycle: init, requirements, design, tasks, approval, implementation prep, status, feedback, plus skills/steering and validation. Minor gaps around editing/versioning of specs exist, but core CRUD-style workflows are covered without dead ends.