advisorsai-check (Advisors AI)
Related Servers
Alternatives to advisorsai-check (Advisors AI)
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceFree, open-source desktop SEO crawler with a built-in MCP server. 250 technical SEO, GEO and AI-search checks across 23 areas, run locally; MCP tools list crawls, inspect issues, run Lighthouse, check AI-crawler access, and apply confirmation-gated WordPress fixes with rollback.61 PyPI19MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOpen-source MCP server that audits websites for AI search readiness, providing deterministic scoring (0-100) and prioritized fix lists for metrics like JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, and AI crawler access.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform comprehensive SEO audits on web pages, including meta tags, headings, links, images, performance, and more, via a CLI or MCP server.181MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceChecks what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and 50+ other AI crawlers can read on a site and what its access policy allows, checks whether a page permits search, answers, training or agent use (with a signed receipt), generates llms.txt, robots.txt and JSON-LD, and reads your Answer Analysis. Nine tools for Claude Desktop, Cursor and other MCP clients.9698 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents tools to inspect a website's visibility to AI answer engines, including crawler permissions, llms.txt, structured data, on-page signals, and a full 29-check AI-readiness audit.50MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that checks a website's AI-search (GEO) readiness: robots.txt access for 16 AI crawlers (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Bingbot...), JSON-LD schema, llms.txt, sitemap and basic SEO tags. Python, stdio, MIT.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another. Its purpose—fetching a single public page plus robots.txt/sitemap.xml/llms.txt and scoring library signals—is explicitly stated.
The single name is descriptive snake_case with a namespace prefix (advisors_) and a clear action suffix (check), which is readable and predictable. With only one tool there is no pattern to verify, so it falls just short of a 5.
For a narrowly scoped public-page audit checker, a single tool is defensible and each capability is bundled coherently. It is still on the thin side (1 tool), leaving no room for complementary operations.
It covers the stated single-page fetch-and-score workflow including robots/sitemap/llms retrieval, but the surface is a dead end: no batch checks, no multi-page crawl, no history or comparison, and no follow-up actions. Agents needing anything beyond one page check will be blocked.