Skip to main content
Glama
manishgadhock-monotype

Monotype MCP Server

by manishgadhock-monotype
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Monotype MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Okta MCP Server

      Zantonse
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates LLMs with Okta's Admin Management APIs, enabling natural language management of users, groups, applications, and more.
      Apache 2.0
    • OneLogin MCP Server by onelogin

      OneLogin MCP Serverofficial

      onelogin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables managing users, apps, roles, authentication, and security settings through natural language, providing comprehensive access to the OneLogin API.
      60 npm
      5
      MIT

    • MCP AI Chat Server

      fawazbayureksa
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Laravel-based AI-powered chat interface for business management operations, enabling users to execute tasks like creating customers and updating task statuses through natural language conversations.
      -

    • Okta MCP Server

      gps-prasad
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Okta users, groups, applications, policies, and logs through natural language commands.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_role_id_by_name retrieves a specific role ID, get_roles_for_customer lists all roles, get_teams_for_customer lists all teams, and invite_user_for_customer handles user invitations. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores, using 'get' for retrieval operations and 'invite' for creation. The naming is predictable and readable across the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 4 tools, the server feels thin for a customer management domain. While the tools cover basic retrieval and user invitation, the scope suggests more operations (e.g., updating roles/teams, managing users) would be expected, making the count borderline.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset has significant gaps for customer management. It lacks update or delete operations for roles, teams, or users, and missing core functions like creating roles/teams or managing user details. This incomplete coverage will likely cause agent failures in common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources