Skip to main content
Glama
manganate006

playwright-spa-mcp

by manganate006
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to playwright-spa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Browser Testing MCP Server

      RomanGod6
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automated browser testing of web applications using Playwright, supporting user interactions, form submissions, console monitoring, network request inspection, and visual verification through screenshots.
      -

    • MCP Playwright Server

      j0hanz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control web browsers through Playwright automation, providing 50+ tools for navigation, interaction, testing, accessibility audits, and visual testing across Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit.
      6 npm
      MIT

    • pw-browser-mcp

      bestdeng
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables browser automation with Playwright, offering 17 tools for navigation, session management, Chrome profile selection, and action recording.
      MIT

    • Browser MCP Server

      MadeByTokens
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A universal browser automation server featuring 63 tools for programmatic Chrome control, multi-tab management, and media interaction using Playwright. It enables advanced actions like session recording, performance profiling, and pixel-based interaction through a safe, isolated browser profile.
      63
      13 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map cleanly to distinct actions, such as navigate, click, fill, screenshot, and session management. The main ambiguity is between spa_fill and spa_type_realistic for input handling, and spa_chain subsumes many individual actions, but the descriptions generally clarify intent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the consistent spa_ prefix and use snake_case, which makes the set feel coherent. Some names are verb-first like spa_get_text, while others are object-first like spa_iframe_click or noun-like spa_http_request, so the pattern is not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 22 tools, the server sits in the heavy 16-25 range. Many tools are justified for browser automation, but iframe variants, the chain command, and session management tools could potentially be consolidated, making the surface feel slightly bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core SPA testing lifecycle well: navigation, clicking, filling, typing, iframes, uploads, drag-and-drop, assertions, sessions, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation. Minor gaps like explicit dropdown/select handling, hover, and dedicated element-wait commands exist, but they can be worked around with spa_evaluate or spa_chain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources