he_get_saved_search
Retrieve details of a saved search by providing its search ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific saved search
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| searchId | Yes | Saved search ID |
Retrieve details of a saved search by providing its search ID.
Get details of a specific saved search
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| searchId | Yes | Saved search ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only nature, authentication requirements, or potential side effects). The description solely states the action without additional context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise (one sentence) with no wasted words. However, it could be slightly more informative without increasing length significantly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate but lacks hints about return values or how to obtain the searchId. It does not leverage the opportunity to add value over the schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the only parameter 'searchId'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'Saved search ID'. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'get', the resource 'saved search', and specificity 'a specific'. It distinguishes from sibling 'he_get_saved_searches' which lists all.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'he_get_saved_searches'. No context about prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/manganate006/homeexchange-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server