Skip to main content
Glama
mandalito

StealthPay MCP

by mandalito

Create Payment Link

create-payment-link
Read-onlyIdempotent

Generate a shareable payment link for an ENS name. The link resolves to a stealth address at payment time, protecting sender privacy.

Instructions

Generate a shareable payment link for an ENS name. The link resolves to a stealth address at payment time, ensuring privacy.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
toYesRecipient ENS name (e.g. "vitalik.eth")
memoNoOptional memo for the payment
chainNoPreferred chain (e.g. "base")
tokenNoToken symbol (e.g. "USDC")
amountNoSuggested amount (e.g. "50.00")

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
webUrlYes
erc681UriYes
recipientYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. The description adds context about the link resolving to a stealth address at payment time, explaining the privacy mechanism. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, directly stating the purpose and key feature. No wasted words, and the key action is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given annotations and full schema coverage, the description is mostly complete. It explains the output's privacy characteristic. The output schema (not shown) likely covers return format, so no missing context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for all 5 parameters. The tool description adds no additional parameter-level meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Generate a shareable payment link') and resource ('ENS name'), and distinguishes it from siblings like 'generate-stealth-address' and 'send-stealth-payment' by specifying the output is a shareable link with privacy features.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating a privacy-preserving payment link, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings like 'generate-stealth-address' or 'send-stealth-payment'. No when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mandalito/StealthPay-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server