Skip to main content
Glama
YouTube Channel Email Finder MCP Server

YouTube Channel Email Finder MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to YouTube Channel Email Finder MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables retrieving contact emails for YouTube channels from URLs, handles, or channel IDs, including the contact-block email, and supports querying multiple channels at once.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables finding a person's email address from LinkedIn, GitHub, a name on a page, X, or YouTube, enriched with roles and company, and reopening previously found contacts with match details.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving YouTube videos, channels, playlists, comments and transcripts through the YouTube Data API v3 using an API key. Provides read-only tools for search, video and channel details, playlist items, comments, trending videos and plain-text caption transcripts.
      154 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables extraction and processing of YouTube video transcripts from individual videos, channels, and playlists. Supports transcript search, batch processing, multiple output formats (JSON, text, SRT, VTT), and bulk operations across multiple videos.
      11
      34 npm
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool in the set there is no possibility of misselection, and the description clearly delimits what the tool does (plain-text published emails only, with sources). No sibling tool overlaps with it.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single name follows a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (find_youtube_channel_emails) and is fully descriptive of the action and target resource. No mixed conventions to worry about.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is on the thin side; the server effectively exposes a single capability with a rich parameter surface rather than a set of composable operations. It is defensible for a narrowly scoped utility, but there is no supporting tooling around it.

    Completeness4/5

    The core capability (lookup by channel or search term with subscriber filter, returning emails plus provenance) is fully covered, including a batch-style input of multiple channels. Minor gaps exist around account/credit visibility and no explicit result-refresh or export operation, which the description's pricing note implies would be useful.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues