Skip to main content
Glama
Site Crawler for Links and Tables MCP Server

Site Crawler for Links and Tables MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Site Crawler for Links and Tables MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables web crawling and content extraction from web pages, supporting multiple output formats like text, markdown, XML, and JSON, with robots.txt compliance and rate limiting.
      14 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables advanced web crawling and content extraction with JavaScript support, AI-powered analysis, PDF/Office document processing, YouTube transcript extraction, Google search integration, and multi-format data export capabilities.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web content scanning and analysis by fetching, analyzing, and extracting information from web pages using tools like page fetching, link extraction, site crawling, and more.
      6
      13
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents and scripts to crawl and map sites, read pages as clean Markdown or structured content, extract data with schemas or local AI, and run multi-angle deep research with numbered sources. It also handles JavaScript-rendered pages through a headless browser and applies safety controls for private addresses, robots.txt, and polite pacing.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possible overlap or misselection risk. Its purpose (crawl a site and return links, tables, and lists) is stated explicitly and leaves no ambiguity about when to use it.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single name crawl_site_links_tables follows snake_case with a leading verb, which is a predictable convention. It is descriptive but concatenates multiple output types into one long name, which is slightly less clean than a tighter verb_noun form.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is thin for a server, though this tool is substantial and bundles several extraction outputs rather than being trivial. A single entry point is workable for a focused crawler, but splitting configuration or output modes would make the surface easier to target.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the stated domain well: internal/external/file links, tables, and lists, with robots.txt compliance noted. Gaps are minor-to-moderate: no depth or max-page control surfaced, no JS rendering fallback, and no way to isolate a single page versus a full crawl.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues