Skip to main content
Glama
Publication Cadence Tracker MCP Server

Publication Cadence Tracker MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Publication Cadence Tracker MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Monitors a company domain for changes in hiring, tech stack, funding, firmographics, and social presence, returning only the deltas as typed change events.
      1
      114 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides deep, structured access to Substack publications with real-time content analysis, including sentiment analysis, readability metrics, and publishing patterns.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to track a list of company domains and retrieve only the job-board changes since the previous run, including new, closed, and reposted postings with full descriptions, stable posting keys, and 30-day hiring velocity per company. It runs on Apify and exposes this through a single tool call.
      1
      106 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables discovery of a company's public feature board (Canny, Featurebase, Frill, UserVoice, Productboard) from its domain and retrieval of its most-voted requests with votes, status, comments, and the integrations customers ask for. Supports monitoring runs that surface only new requests, status changes, and vote jumps since a prior run using a saved state key.
      1
      125 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    The server has only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly described, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern ('track_publication_cadence') that matches the server's name, providing a consistent and predictable naming scheme.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only one tool, the server feels slightly thin, but the tool is comprehensive in its function. This falls at the borderline for appropriate tool count.

    Completeness5/5

    The single tool thoroughly covers the domain of tracking publication cadence, including robust handling of date reliability, estimates, and format details. There are no obvious gaps in the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues