Government Contract Award Monitor MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| APIFY_TOKEN | Yes | Your Apify API token. Get one at https://console.apify.com/account/integrations |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| monitor_public_awardsA | Pick a public award register and a time window and it returns the companies that won public work in it, one flat row per winning company rather than one per award, with award count, total value, largest award, awarding body, award date, a deep link to the source record, and a resolved company domain. Five registers are covered: US federal contracts and US federal grants from USASpending, NIH SBIR and STTR from NIH RePORTER, and UK Contracts Finder and UK Find a Tender. This reports awards that have already been made, so it is not a tender feed and will not tell you what is open to bid on. US federal data lags about two days, so a one day window on a US register returns little or nothing. Winners are sorted by total award value and max_entities is the hard cap on billed rows. Requires an APIFY_TOKEN and consumes Apify credits. Read only. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool exists, so there is no overlap or ambiguity between tool purposes.
The tool name 'monitor_public_awards' uses a clear verb-noun pattern that accurately describes its function.
A single tool is minimal, but the tool itself aggregates multiple award registers, making it a self-contained utility. Still, one tool feels thin for a server.
The tool fully covers the monitoring of public awards across multiple registers, providing award counts, values, dates, and source links. No obvious dead ends.