Skip to main content
Glama
mambalabsdev

mcp-meta-ad-library-monitor

by mambalabsdev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-meta-ad-library-monitor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-reddit-brand-presence

      mambalabsdev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Mamba Labs Reddit Brand Presence and Mention Monitor actor on Apify. Resolve a company domain to its subreddit and sample public mentions of the brand.
      1
      26 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-people-finder

      mambalabsdev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Mamba Labs People Finder & Email Verifier actor on Apify. Give it a company domain, name or LinkedIn URL and it returns the people at that company who match your role, seniority and department filters, each as a structured contact record with an optional verified business email.
      1
      37 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of misselection — an agent will always choose find_meta_ads. Its purpose is clearly described and its output format is explicit, so there is zero ambiguity in tool choice.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single tool name follows the standard verb_noun snake_case convention (find_meta_ads), which is clean and conventional. However, one tool cannot demonstrate consistency 'throughout' a set, so the pattern is plausible but unproven rather than fully established.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool feels thin for a server presenting itself as an ad-library 'monitor.' That said, find_meta_ads is substantial and covers a full search-and-retrieve workflow, so it is not the trivial single-tool extreme case.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool thoroughly covers the core search workflow — creative details, delivery dates, surfaces, snapshot URL, and coverage caveats — and is honest about API limitations. However, the 'monitor' framing implies ongoing tracking or follow-up capabilities that are absent: no fetch-by-ID, no time-based comparison, and no way to manage watched advertisers, which an agent cannot work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources