mcp-icp-fit-scorer
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-icp-fit-scorer
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables enriching company domains into structured firmographics including employee band, industry, HQ, founded year, revenue estimate, logo, and description, with source provenance and data completeness scoring.155 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceResolves any combination of company name, domain, or LinkedIn URL into the canonical company identity (name, domain, LinkedIn URL) with confidence scores and match method.155 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables predictive B2B outbound buying propensity scoring by aggregating time-decayed hiring, funding, and technographic signals, then classifying accounts into outbound action tiers.8-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables enrichment of company domains with verified firmographic signals including tech stack, hiring activity, email infrastructure, and SOC 2 compliance, returning compact typed JSON for AI agents.312 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDetects a company's technology stack from its public web presence. Returns structured tech signals for sales targeting and competitive analysis.197 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSales intelligence for DACH & EU SMEs — lead scoring, ICP fit, CRM enrichment & writeback.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. The name and description clearly communicate its single, focused purpose.
The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (score_icp_fit). There are no other naming conventions to create inconsistency or ambiguity.
One tool is at the low end of the typical range. For a narrow, single-purpose ICP scorer this is defensible, but the surface feels thin compared with more comprehensive MCP servers.
The tool covers the core scoring workflow well, with flexible ICP definition via template, JSON config, or plain-English description, and returns a per-signal breakdown. Minor gaps exist around managing stored ICP templates or estimating Apify credit usage before making a call.