Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mcp-gtm-suite

mcp-gtm-suite

by mambalabsdev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-gtm-suite

Related Servers

  • openmud

    bilhokista
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to discover companies showing buying signals, enrich them with public homepage data, score them against custom rules, and draft review-ready briefs.
    1
    MIT

  • B2B Intelligence MCP n8n Suite

    Burapa-J
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and automation workflows to enrich company domains with verified contacts and tech-stack data, verify bulk emails through DNS MX and disposable-domain checks, retrieve active ATS job listings for hiring-intent signals, and generate MX-verified executive leads.
    5
    MIT

  • BizIntel MCP

    bch1212
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Provides real-time website audits, lead scoring, tech-stack detection, and local-business search for AI agents doing sales outreach and competitor research.
    MIT
  • Sorzio MCP Server

    Sorzio MCP Serverofficial

    sorzio
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and Google Sheets to verify emails, enrich company and person data from web and LinkedIn sources, score ICP fit, run scheduled multi-step lead workflows, and publish personalized prospect microsites at scale.
    1
    MIT

  • signal-prospector

    thomasproject-stack
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables B2B prospecting from natural language: detect buying signals, score leads against ICP, enrich decision-makers, and draft personalized outreach messages via Claude.
    2
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 21 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target clearly distinct resources (hiring, tech stack, funding, social, events, awards, legal entity, AI, outbound, publications), and descriptions explicitly cross-reference sibling tools to steer selection (e.g. scan_job_board_keywords vs scan_gtm_hiring_signals). The main overlap is compositional: aggregate_gtm_signals and get_company_changes both re-invoke the primitive scan/detect tools, so an agent must decide composite vs primitive despite the explanations.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows a strict snake_case verb_noun convention (scan_*, resolve_*, detect_*, map_*, get_*, audit_*, classify_*, monitor_*, capture_*). No camelCase or mixed styles, and the verb choice is predictable across the whole suite.

Tool Count4/5

At 21 tools the suite is on the heavier side, but each tool maps to a genuinely distinct enrichment or action (identity, firmographics, funding, AI maturity, outbound infra, publication cadence, awards, etc.), so nothing is redundant filler. It is slightly over the ideal range for a single server rather than bloated with duplicates.

Completeness4/5

The GTM enrichment surface is broad, covering firmographics, hiring, tech stack, funding, social, events, awards, legal entity, ICP scoring, and sequencer push. The notable gap is people/contact discovery: classify_contact explicitly does not find people, and there is no email or contact-finder tool, which a full GTM workflow would need (presumably supplied externally via Clay).

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

Resources