Company Social Presence Mapper MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| APIFY_TOKEN | Yes | Apify API token from https://console.apify.com/account/integrations. Runs the Company Social Presence Mapper actor (ID 4k6CCemkgBDz18m2h). |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| map_company_social_presenceA | Map a company's social media presence across LinkedIn, X, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube. Returns profile URLs and follower counts in flat Clay-ready JSON. Profiles are discovered from the company's own homepage links, a web search fallback, and pattern guessing, then validated against the company. Follower counts are extracted where public; X is URL-only (its count needs login) and Instagram and Facebook counts are best-effort. Read-only; requires an APIFY_TOKEN and consumes Apify credits per call. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined, so an agent can unambiguously select it for the task of mapping social presence.
The single tool name, map_company_social_presence, uses clear and descriptive snake_case. There are no other tools to compare, so no inconsistency exists.
One tool for the domain of social presence mapping is borderline. While the tool is comprehensive, a single tool covering all platforms may be seen as too coarse. The count is acceptable but not ideal.
The tool covers the core functionality of discovering profiles and fetching follower counts, but with noted limitations (e.g., X follower count missing, Instagram and Facebook counts best-effort). For the stated purpose, it is mostly complete but has gaps.