Skip to main content
Glama
mambalabsdev

AI Answer Visibility Tracker MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to AI Answer Visibility Tracker MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to interrogate ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with buyer questions and live web search to learn whether a business is recommended, ranked, competing with others, and having its website cited. Returns structured findings and estimated provider costs.
      1
      99 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables tracking AI search visibility by showing how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews answer your tracked questions, whether they mention your brand, how you compare with competitors, and which sources they cite.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying a brand's visibility in AI assistant answers, including competitor presence, tracked prompts, and the answers and sources behind the metrics.
      60
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables auditing AI search visibility: checks site readiness for AI crawlers and measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend your site, including verbatim answers and citation gap analysis.
      79 npm
      4
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Audit your brand's visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI - get citation rates, AEO health scores, content gap analysis, and a 9-page content suite to rank in AI-generated answers.
      5
      51 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Track how your brand appears in AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other AI models. Analyze visibility, sentiment, citations, and domain rankings with 31 tools — including analytics reports, chat inspection, query analysis, and full CRUD for brands, prompts, tags, and topics.
      17
      52 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of tool-selection confusion. Its purpose is clearly scoped to checking AI answer visibility for a brand across questions and engines.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern: track_ai_answer_visibility. With only one tool, there are no competing conventions or naming inconsistencies.

    Tool Count4/5

    A single tool is reasonable for a focused visibility-tracking operation, and it avoids unnecessary surface area. However, the one tool bundles many engines, sampling, and summary outputs, so 1 tool is on the thin side and could arguably be split into more granular operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core domain well: multi-engine querying, sampling, per-answer rows, per-question summaries, per-brand summaries, and input/error handling. Minor gaps remain around retrieving prior runs by run ID or managing historical visibility comparisons, but the main workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues