Agent to Brokerage Resolver MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Agent to Brokerage Resolver MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceReal-time contractor license verification across 45 US states. Verifies license status, expiration, and disciplinary history directly against state licensing board portals.434 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents and procurement systems to verify contractor licenses against official state boards, search contractors by trade and location, audit workers' comp, surety bonds and OSHA safety records, and check SAM.gov federal debarment status. It returns a deterministic ALLOW/WARN/BLOCK compliance decision plus registry health metrics for US trade contractors.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to research U.S. companies and associated people using official state registries and free regulatory datasets, with normalized evidence and optional browser automation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides US real estate data including housing stats, demographics, nearby amenities, area comparisons, cost-of-living analysis, and neighborhood search via free public APIs without any API keys.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOwner, APN and address lookup across 479 US counties (494 verified ArcGIS REST endpoints, all 50 states plus DC), plus city code-violation, building-permit and zoning-case datasets. No API key; built on public county GIS data.441,507 npm1MIT

BizVerify MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to verify and search business entities across US state and international company registries, providing real-time confirmation of legal existence, status, and filings.9MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With a single tool, there is no possibility of misselection between tools. The tool's purpose (resolving an agent to a brokerage via three explicit modes) is unambiguous.
The sole tool uses a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (resolve_agent_brokerage). With only one tool there is no internal inconsistency, and the name is readable and domain-specific.
One tool for an entire server is on the thin side; the three modes are packed into a single tool rather than exposed as separate operations. It is defensible for a narrow resolver, but by the stated guidance 1-2 tools is borderline.
The lookup, roster_firm, and roster_zip modes cover the main access patterns for agent and brokerage data. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct supported-states/coverage query or explicit brokerage lookup by name), but core workflows are covered.