Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to swisstopo-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are largely well-differentiated, and descriptions include explicit cross-references between overlapping workflows (e.g., swisstopo_oereb_at vs swisstopo_get_oereb_extract, swisstopo_map_query vs swisstopo_query_geodata). However, a few pairs could still be confused at the name level, such as swisstopo_map_query and swisstopo_query_geodata, or swisstopo_geocode and swisstopo_search_address, so it is not perfectly ambiguity-free.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools use snake_case with the swisstopo_ prefix, and the '_at' suffix forms a clear pattern for coordinate-based lookups (municipality_at, zoning_at, oereb_at). Still, there are minor deviations like swisstopo_map_url, swisstopo_map_query, and swisstopo_elevation_profile, which lack the verb-object structure used elsewhere; the mixed get_/query_/search_ verbs also prevent a perfect score.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 20 tools, the server is near the upper boundary of what is easy for an agent to navigate. The count is understandable for a national geodata platform covering geocoding, elevation, maps, OEREB, STAC downloads, and address lookups, but several tools could have been consolidated or layered more tightly.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main Swiss geodata workflows: geocoding and reverse geocoding, height and elevation profiles, coordinate conversion, map/feature queries, zoning, municipality and postal-code lookups, OEREB/EGRID, and downloadable STAC collections. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tile/WMS URL generation or administrative boundary geometry retrieval except through swisstopo_map_query, but these are workable gaps rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive