swiss-democracy-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to swiss-democracy-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn unofficial MCP server for accessing Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS) data.81MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server connecting AI models to the Swiss Federal Parliament via the Curia Vista OData API, enabling queries of motions, votes, members, sessions, and debate transcripts without authentication.7277 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceSwiss open data MCP server — transport, weather, geodata, companies, etc,. Zero API keys.76145 npm23MIT

entscheidsuche-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Swiss court decisions, enabling full-text search and retrieval of published decisions from all Swiss federal and cantonal courts in German, French, and Italian.4MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Swiss federal finances (EFV), providing read-only tools to query budget, debt, forecasts, and spending by task and institution from public data.650 PyPIMIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Swiss federal tax calculator, providing income, wealth, inheritance, and corporate tax figures for all Swiss municipalities and tax years 2010-2026.132-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools are cleanly separated by data source and action: search, detail, party positions, and cantonal results are distinct views of a vote, while the bfs and polis prefixes identify alternative sources. The main potential confusion is between the two date-listing tools and between Swissvotes and Polis for historical vote lookup, but the descriptions clarify the source and purpose.
Names follow a consistent democracy_<source>_<verb>_<object> pattern using list, get, and search verbs. Minor inconsistencies exist: 'vote' and 'votation' are used interchangeably, and the BFS tools place the source prefix differently, but the overall pattern is predictable.
Ten tools is well-scoped for a server covering three Swiss democracy data sources: Swissvotes, BFS realtime results, and SRGSSR Polis. Each tool serves a distinct query or detail need, and the count is neither bloated nor too thin.
The Swissvotes side covers search, detail, party positions, and cantonal results, while BFS covers recent/real-time results and Polis covers historical votes with municipality detail and election lists. The main gap is that Polis elections lack a detail/drill-down tool, and there is no direct cross-linking between Swissvotes and BFS result URLs, but core research workflows are supported.