register-mcp
> π¨π **Part of the [Swiss Public Data MCP Portfolio](https://github.com/malkreide)**
# register-mcp

[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[](https://www.python.org/downloads/)
[](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/)
[](https://github.com/malkreide/register-mcp)

> MCP Server for the Swiss Federal Commercial Register (Zefix/Handelsregister), with a **company-UID join** to the official gazettes (SHAB + cantonal AmtsblΓ€tter)
[π©πͺ Deutsche Version](README.de.md)
---
## Overview
`register-mcp` provides AI-native access to **two** Swiss federal data sources, joined on the UID, all without authentication:
| Source | Data | API |
|--------|------|-----|
| **Zefix (Handelsregister)** | Swiss companies, legal forms, registered-office data | ZefixREST v1 |
| **Amtsblattportal** | Everything published **about a specific company** (by its UID): HR mutations, calls to creditors, bankruptcy | amtsblattportal.ch v1 |
The two sources share one key β the **UID**. The value is in the join: **Zefix tells you whether a company exists; the gazette tells you what has been published about it.**
The gazette access here is deliberately **company-scoped only** β keyed on a company UID or a specific publication id. There is **no free-text / person-name gazette search** in this server; that would be a profiling tool over the gazette's person-data rubrics (bankruptcy, debt-collection, inheritance). Broad Amtsblatt platform search (procurement, cantonal notices, full-text) is proposed as a separate `amtsblatt-mcp` β see [`docs/amtsblatt-mcp-proposal.md`](docs/amtsblatt-mcp-proposal.md) and the **Data Protection & Scope** section below.
Designed for Swiss public administration use cases: vendor verification, contract partner due diligence, and supplier onboarding β all via natural language queries.
**Anchor demo query:** *"Before we sign a framework agreement with Lehrmittelverlag ZΓΌrich AG: is the company active in the commercial register, what is its UID and stated purpose β and, via that UID, what has the official gazette published about it (HR mutations, calls to creditors, any bankruptcy)?"*
That single question walks the whole tool chain across both sources:
```
zefix_search_company β zefix_verify_company β gazette_company_publications(uid=β¦) β gazette_get_publication(id=β¦)
```
---
## Features
- ποΈ **9 tools** across two sources β company search & verification (Zefix) + the company-scoped gazette join (SHAB/cantonal)
- π **`gazette_company_publications`** β the UID join: everything published about a company
- π‘οΈ **Data-protection-safe by construction** β the only gazette entry points are UID- or id-scoped; no person-name search entry exists (see *Data Protection & Scope*)
- π **`zefix_verify_company`** β quick active/dissolved status check
- π **Bilingual output** (Markdown / JSON) with per-source attribution + `provenance`
- π **No API key required** β open data from zefix.admin.ch and amtsblattportal.ch
- βοΈ **Transports** β stdio (Claude Desktop) + Streamable HTTP at `/mcp` (cloud, native MCP spec `2026-07-28`); SSE kept for existing deployments
---
## Prerequisites
- Python 3.11+
- [uv](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv) (recommended) or pip
---
## Installation
```bash
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/malkreide/register-mcp.git
cd register-mcp
# Install
pip install -e .
# or with uv:
uv pip install -e .
```
Or with `uvx` (no permanent installation):
```bash
uvx register-mcp
```
---
## Quickstart
```bash
# stdio (for Claude Desktop)
python -m register_mcp.server
# Streamable HTTP (cloud deployment, endpoint /mcp) β MCP_API_KEY is REQUIRED
MCP_API_KEY=$(openssl rand -hex 32) MCP_TRANSPORT=streamable-http PORT=8000 \
python -m register_mcp.server
```
### HTTP / Cloud Deployment
Two HTTP transports are available:
| `MCP_TRANSPORT` | Endpoint | Protocol revisions |
|---|---|---|
| `streamable-http` (container default) | `POST /mcp` | `2026-07-28` per-request envelope **and** the `initialize` handshake up to `2025-11-25` |
| `sse` | `GET /sse` + `POST /messages/` | handshake era only β kept so existing deployments keep working |
`streamable-http` runs stateless with JSON responses: no `Mcp-Session-Id`, no
session held in a single process, so a second instance needs no sticky
sessions.
> β οΈ **Upgrade note (0.7.0):** the container image and `compose.yaml` now
> default to `streamable-http`. Clients configured with `β¦/sse` must switch to
> `β¦/mcp`, or the deployment sets `MCP_TRANSPORT=sse` explicitly.
With either HTTP transport, the server enforces:
- **Bearer-token auth** β set `MCP_API_KEY` to a secret string. Clients must send
`Authorization: Bearer <key>` on every request. Missing or wrong β HTTP 401.
The server refuses to start without `MCP_API_KEY` set.
- **Rate limiting** β sliding window per bearer-token hash. Defaults: 60 req / 60 s.
Tunable via `MCP_RATE_LIMIT` and `MCP_RATE_WINDOW`. Exceeding the limit returns
HTTP 429 with `Retry-After`.
- **Structured JSON logging** β every tool call emits one line to stderr with
`tool`, `status`, `latency_ms`. Auth failures and rate-limit events are logged
at WARNING level. Configure verbosity with `LOG_LEVEL` (default `INFO`).
- **Reference-data cache** β Zefix legal-forms are cached for 24h
(`LEGAL_FORMS_TTL` seconds) to avoid an extra upstream call per tool invocation.
- **Egress allow-list** β outbound HTTP is restricted to `www.zefix.admin.ch`
and `amtsblattportal.ch` via an `httpx` request hook that also fires on
redirects. A `Location` header pointing elsewhere raises `EgressDenied` and is
never followed. Override with `MCP_ALLOWED_HOSTS=host1,host2` (comma-separated,
lower-case).
> β οΈ **Upgrade note (0.2.x β 0.3.0):** `amtsblattportal.ch` was added to the
> **default** allow-list when the gazette tools shipped. If your deployment
> **pins** `MCP_ALLOWED_HOSTS`, that value overrides the default entirely β
> add `amtsblattportal.ch` to it, or every `gazette_*` call will raise
> `EgressDenied`.
- **Optional OpenTelemetry tracing** β install with `pip install register-mcp[otel]`
and set `OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT` (e.g. `http://otel-collector:4318/v1/traces`).
Without the extra or without the env var the server stays silent β no hard
dependency on the OTel SDK.
For multi-instance deployments, place a real gateway (Cloudflare, Railway internal
networking, an API-Gateway with Redis-backed rate limiting) in front of the
in-memory limiter, which is per-process by design.
### Container deployment
A minimal multi-stage `Dockerfile` ships with the repo. The image runs as a
non-root `mcp` user; dependencies are resolved from `uv.lock` (`uv sync
--frozen`), so the build is reproducible.
```bash
docker build -t register-mcp:local .
docker run --rm -p 8000:8000 \
-e MCP_API_KEY="$(openssl rand -hex 32)" \
register-mcp:local
# β Streamable HTTP on http://localhost:8000/mcp
```
For local iteration there is a `compose.yaml` with `read_only`, `cap_drop: ALL`
and `no-new-privileges`:
```bash
MCP_API_KEY=$(openssl rand -hex 32) docker compose up --build
```
See [SECURITY.md](SECURITY.md) for hardening notes (egress restriction, key
rotation, SIEM forwarding).
Try it immediately in Claude Desktop:
> *"Is Lehrmittelverlag ZΓΌrich AG active in the commercial register?"*
> *"Look up the company with UID CHE-108.954.978"*
> *"List all Swiss legal forms"*
---
## Configuration
### Claude Desktop
Edit `~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json` (macOS) or `%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json` (Windows):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"register": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "register_mcp.server"]
}
}
}
```
Or with `uvx`:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"register": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["register-mcp"]
}
}
}
```
**Config file locations:**
- macOS: `~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json`
- Windows: `%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json`
### Cloud Deployment (Streamable HTTP for browser access)
For use via **claude.ai in the browser** (e.g. on managed workstations without local software):
**Render.com (recommended):**
1. Push/fork the repository to GitHub
2. On [render.com](https://render.com): New Web Service β connect GitHub repo
3. Set start command `python -m register_mcp.server` and the environment
variables `MCP_TRANSPORT=streamable-http` and `MCP_API_KEY=<secret>`
(Render provides `PORT`)
4. In claude.ai under Settings β MCP Servers, add: `https://your-app.onrender.com/mcp`
> π‘ *"stdio for the developer laptop, Streamable HTTP for the browser."*
---
## Available Tools
**Zefix β commercial register (6):**
| Tool | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `zefix_search_companies` | Search companies by name, canton, legal form |
| `zefix_get_company` | Full company profile by internal EHRAID |
| `zefix_get_company_by_uid` | Company lookup by UID (CHE-xxx.xxx.xxx) |
| `zefix_verify_company` | Quick active/dissolved status check |
| `zefix_list_legal_forms` | All Swiss legal forms with IDs |
| `zefix_list_municipalities` | Swiss municipalities with BFS IDs |
**Amtsblattportal β the company-scoped gazette join (3):**
| Tool | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `gazette_company_publications` | **The UID join.** All gazette publications for a company **UID**, newest first, optional (validated) rubric/time filters |
| `gazette_get_publication` | Single publication incl. XML full text, defensively parsed (by publication id) |
| `gazette_source_status` | Reachability of both sources + cache ages (rubrics, legal forms) |
The prefix is `gazette_`, not `shab_`, because the source covers SHAB **and** the cantonal gazettes. Every entry point is UID- or id-scoped β see **Data Protection & Scope**. Broad, non-company gazette search (procurement, cantonal full-text) is scoped to the separate [`amtsblatt-mcp`](docs/amtsblatt-mcp-proposal.md).
### Example Use Cases
| Query | Tool |
|-------|------|
| *"Is Lehrmittelverlag ZΓΌrich AG active?"* | `zefix_verify_company` |
| *"Look up CHE-108.954.978"* | `zefix_get_company_by_uid` |
| *"Find companies named Migros in canton ZH"* | `zefix_search_companies` |
| *"What has been published about CHE-116.115.052?"* | `gazette_company_publications` |
| *"Show the full official text of that HR deletion notice"* | `gazette_get_publication` |
| *"Are both data sources reachable right now?"* | `gazette_source_status` |
---
## Architecture
```
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
ββββββΆβ Zefix (Handelsregister) β
β β www.zefix.admin.ch β
βββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ΄ββ β ZefixREST/api/v1 β
β Claude / AI ββββββΆβ register-mcp β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β (MCP Host) βββββββ (MCP Server) β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
βββββββββββββββββββ β 9 Tools (zefix_ + gazette_) ββββΆβ Amtsblattportal β
β stdio | HTTP /mcp | SSE β β amtsblattportal.ch/api/v1 β
β Egress allow-list β β SHAB + cantonal gazettes β
β No authentication required β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
join key: UID (CHE-XXX.XXX.XXX)
```
### Data Source Characteristics
| Source | Protocol | Coverage | Auth |
|--------|----------|----------|------|
| Zefix | REST/JSON | Swiss companies, legal forms, registered offices | None |
| Amtsblattportal | REST/JSON (list) + XML (full text) | SHAB + cantonal gazettes, 2.79M publications | None |
| ZefixPublicREST (planned) | REST/JSON | Signatories, capital, full history | Basic Auth (free) |
| UID Register (planned) | SOAP | MwSt, NOGA codes, cross-validation | Public (20 req/min) |
### The UID join β Zefix β Amtsblatt
The two sources share exactly one key: the **UID** (`CHE-XXX.XXX.XXX`). That is
what turns them from two data sets into one workflow.
```
zefix_get_company_by_uid(uid) # Zefix: does the company exist? status, purpose, legal form
β UID
βΌ
gazette_company_publications(uid) # Gazette: everything published about it (HR, KK, SB, LS, β¦)
β publication id
βΌ
gazette_get_publication(id) # Full official text from the per-rubric XML
```
Two properties of the source shape this path (both verified in
[`docs/probe-shab.md`](docs/probe-shab.md)):
- The **bulk list carries no company UID** (`meta.uid` is `null`). The company
UID lives only in the **single-publication fetch** β `meta.uid` in the single
JSON, or `<uid>` in the XML (which also carries the full text). So the join
runs *list β per-hit single fetch β match against the Zefix UID*.
- `gazette_company_publications` filters the corpus by `uids=<UID>` directly, so
in practice you get the company's publications in one call without walking
every record.
### Procurement lives in the separate `amtsblatt-mcp`
Public procurement (Submissionen) is **not** a federal SHAB rubric and is **not**
covered by this server. It exists only as a **cantonal** `OB-<canton>` rubric,
only a few cantons publish it in this portal, and most β including **ZΓΌrich** β
route tenders through **[simap.ch](https://www.simap.ch/)**, a separate platform.
Procurement, cantonal notices, and broad full-text search are scoped to the
proposed [`amtsblatt-mcp`](docs/amtsblatt-mcp-proposal.md) server, which applies
a fail-closed **green-rubric allow-list**. See that proposal for the full
`OB-*` coverage map and the rubric traffic-light table.
> **`SB` β Submissionen.** `SB` is *Schuldbetreibungen* (debt collection), a
> person-data-heavy rubric this server never exposes as a search entry.
---
## Data Protection & Scope
This section is **not** a footnote β it is the reason the server is shaped the
way it is.
The Amtsblattportal systematically publishes rubrics containing personal data of
**natural** persons: bankruptcies (`KK`), debt-collection (`SB`), calls to
creditors (`LS`/`SR`), inheritance/estate calls (`ES`, `TE-*`), and building
applications with owner names. Those publications are public β but making them
*systematically queryable by name* through an AI agent is a repurposing the
publication never intended, and under the revised Swiss Federal Act on Data
Protection (**revDSG**) a "show me every debt-collection entry for person X" tool
is a profiling instrument. Deliberate design choices follow:
- **No person-based search entry.** No tool takes a natural person's name, birth
date or address. The only gazette entry points are keyed on a **company UID**
(`gazette_company_publications`) or an opaque **publication id**
(`gazette_get_publication`). A firm's own bankruptcy *is* returned via its UID β
that is corporate data about a legal person, not name-based profiling.
- **No free-text gazette search here.** `keyword` and `cantons` are not even on
the internal query-parameter allow-list, so no future code change can smuggle a
corpus-wide keyword search in. Broad search lives in `amtsblatt-mcp` behind a
fail-closed green allow-list (procurement, HR, official notices only).
- **No persistence of publication content.** The server is a pass-through; only
the rubric taxonomy and Zefix legal-forms list are cached in memory (24 h).
Official publications carry statutory deletion periods β a store that outlived
them would actively undermine those periods.
- **Fail closed.** Rubric codes are validated against the live taxonomy before
any call; an unknown code is refused, not silently widened.
The broad-platform counterpart, its green/yellow/red rubric classification and
its fail-closed design are specified in
[`docs/amtsblatt-mcp-proposal.md`](docs/amtsblatt-mcp-proposal.md).
---
## Architecture decision
**ARCH A β live-API-only**, consistent with the existing Zefix integration
(decided 2026-07-18).
The Amtsblattportal is queried live on every call. All endpoints respond in
0.2β2.0 s, and the use case β targeted company and topic research β does not
need a local bulk copy. A bulk dump would mean mirroring 2.79M records, with an
ongoing sync burden and staleness risk, for no benefit to the join-on-UID
workflow. The taxonomy (`/rubrics`) and the Zefix legal-forms list are the only
data cached, each for 24h in memory, because they change at most a few times a
year and every filtered call needs them.
---
## Phased Implementation
| Phase | API | Auth | Status |
|-------|-----|------|--------|
| **Phase 1** | `ZefixREST/api/v1` | None | **Current** |
| **Phase 2** | `ZefixPublicREST/api/v1` | Basic Auth (free, email zefix@bj.admin.ch) | Planned |
| **Phase 3** | UID-Register SOAP | Public (20 req/min) | Planned |
Phase 2 will add: signatory details, share capital, full historical entries.
Phase 3 will add: MwSt status, NOGA industry codes, cross-register validation.
---
## Project Structure
```
register-mcp/
βββ src/register_mcp/
β βββ __init__.py # Package
β βββ server.py # 9 tools (Zefix + company-scoped gazette join)
βββ tests/
β βββ test_server.py # Zefix unit + integration tests (mocked HTTP)
β βββ test_gazette.py # Gazette tools + the three quirks (mocked HTTP)
β βββ test_egress.py # Egress allow-list
βββ docs/
β βββ probe-shab.md # Phase-1 live probe of amtsblattportal.ch
β βββ amtsblatt-mcp-proposal.md# Spec for the separate broad-platform server
β βββ demo/ # vhs demo script + standalone CLI demo
βββ .github/workflows/ci.yml # GitHub Actions (Python 3.11/3.12/3.13)
βββ pyproject.toml
βββ CHANGELOG.md
βββ CONTRIBUTING.md
βββ LICENSE
βββ README.md # This file (English)
βββ README.de.md # German version
```
---
## Known Limitations
- Search by canton without a name filter may return API errors (Zefix API limitation)
- Phase 1 Zefix API may be rate-limited under heavy load; retry after a short delay
- ZefixPublicREST (new API) requires registration: email zefix@bj.admin.ch
### Amtsblattportal β verified behaviour (live-checked 2026-07-18)
| Call | HTTP | Status | Records | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `/publications?publicationStates=PUBLISHED` | 200 | OK | 2,790,323 | baseline (full corpus) β never queried unfiltered |
| `?uids=CHE-116.115.052` | 200 | **OK** | 4 | **the join β core (and only) gazette entry** |
| `?uids=β¦&rubrics=HR` | 200 | OK | β | optional, validated rubric narrowing on the join |
| `/publications/{id}/xml` | 200 | OK | β | full text, rubric-specific schema |
| `/rubrics` | 200 | OK | β | taxonomy (for code validation) |
| `?rubrics=ZZZZ` (invalid) | **200** | **Silent Empty** | 0, `total: null` | Quirk 2 |
| `?uid=β¦` (wrong param name) | **200** | **Silent Ignore** | **2,790,323** | Quirk 1 |
> Free-text (`keyword`) and broad `cantons` search are **not** performed by this
> server β those probe results live in [`docs/probe-shab.md`](docs/probe-shab.md)
> and inform the separate `amtsblatt-mcp`.
### Zefix β verified behaviour (live-checked 2026-08-15)
Found by the weekly live suite, not by the unit tests β which stayed green
throughout.
| Call to `firm/search.json` | HTTP | Result |
|---|---|---|
| `{"name": "Migros", β¦}` | 200 | 35 hits |
| a name with no hits | **404** | NORESULT envelope β *not* an empty 200 |
| `{"uid": "109741634", β¦}` | **400** | Bad Request β there is no `uid` field |
| `{"name": "CHE-999.999.999", "searchType": "CONTAINS"}` | 200 | **Β«CHEMAM - 999Β»**, UID CHE-113.593.998 |
| a dissolved firm without `activeOnly: false` | 404 | NORESULT β as if it never existed |
**Three shapes, one shipped bug each:**
- **No hits answer with HTTP 404**, carrying the NORESULT envelope. Every call
therefore goes through `_zefix_post_search`; a raw `raise_for_status()` makes
the friendly branch unreachable. That is how `zefix_verify_company` shipped
answering *"Eintrag nicht gefunden. Bitte EHRAID oder UID prΓΌfen"* to a **name**
search, where neither an EHRAID nor a UID was in play. A fixture that puts the
NORESULT body into a 200 makes exactly that dead branch look green.
- **A hit list is not an answer.** UID lookup searches the *name* field with
`searchType: CONTAINS`, so `CHE-999.999.999` returns a real company under a UID
that is not its own. Defence: exact digit match or nothing β no `firms[0]`
fallback. The former fallback produced a complete, plausible, formatted record
about somebody else, indistinguishable from a correct answer.
- **Without `activeOnly: false`, "dissolved" looks like "never existed".**
Zefix returns only active entries by default; `zefix_verify_company` sets the
flag deliberately. A firm with no UID comes back as a **string of blanks**
(`uid: " "`, `uidFormatted: null`), not as `null`.
**Three quirks are defended in code** (details in the [CHANGELOG](CHANGELOG.md)
under *Known findings*):
- **Quirk 1 β Silent Ignore (critical).** Unknown query parameters are dropped
silently and return the full 2.79M corpus with HTTP 200. Defence: query
strings are built exclusively from an `ALLOWED_GAZETTE_PARAMS` allow-list, and
every filtered response is plausibility-checked β a `total` above 2,000,000 is
rejected as *"filter ignored by upstream β result not trustworthy"*.
- **Quirk 2 β Silent Empty.** An invalid rubric code returns HTTP 200 with an
empty result. Defence: the `/rubrics` taxonomy is cached 24h and every code is
validated **before** any call, failing with the five closest valid codes.
- **Quirk 3 β Two-step fetch.** The JSON list carries only `meta`; the content
lives only in the per-rubric namespaced XML. Defence: namespace-agnostic
defensive parsing (`meta` + `publicationText` mandatory, HR `company` when
present, everything else in `additional_fields`).
---
## Safety & Limits
### Rate Limits
| API | Limit | Notes |
|-----|-------|-------|
| ZefixREST (Phase 1) | Not officially documented | Throttling possible under heavy load β retry after 1β2 s |
| ZefixPublicREST (Phase 2) | Not officially documented | Requires prior registration (free) |
| UID-Register SOAP (Phase 3) | **20 req/min** | Hard limit, publicly documented |
### Data Privacy
- **Read-only access** β all tools carry `readOnlyHint: True`; the server performs no write, delete, or mutation operations against any API
- **No person-based search entry** β no tool accepts a natural person's name, birth date or address; gazette access is UID- or publication-id-scoped only (see **Data Protection & Scope**). This is a deliberate revDSG-driven design choice, not an accident of the API
- **No persistence of publication content** β the server is a stateless pass-through; only the rubric taxonomy and Zefix legal-forms list are cached in memory (24 h), never publication bodies, so statutory deletion periods are respected
- **Public register data only** β the Zefix Handelsregister is a public federal register (HRegV); gazette data returned is likewise legally public, retrieved per company UID
- **No personal tracking** β the server does not transmit user identity, query history, or session data to the upstream sources
### Terms of Service & Data Sources
- **Zefix API ToS:** Usage of the Zefix REST API is governed by the [zefix.admin.ch terms of use](https://www.zefix.admin.ch). The data is published under the [Open Government Data (OGD) Switzerland](https://opendata.swiss/) principles.
- **SHAB:** Swiss Official Gazette of Commerce β published by the Federal Chancellery (BK). Public by law.
- **Institutional use:** This server is designed for read-only queries in public administration workflows. Not suitable for mass harvesting or automated surveillance use cases.
### Security
- No credentials are stored or transmitted (Phase 1)
- Phase 2 credentials (`ZEFIX_USER`, `ZEFIX_PASSWORD`) are passed via environment variables only β never hardcoded
- All HTTP calls use HTTPS exclusively
- Tool inputs are validated via Pydantic v2 before any API call is made
---
## Demo

> π½οΈ *Terminal GIF coming soon β see [`docs/demo/`](docs/demo/) to generate it locally with [vhs](https://github.com/charmbracelet/vhs)*
**Example interaction:**
```
User: "Is Lehrmittelverlag ZΓΌrich AG active in the commercial register?"
β Tool: zefix_verify_company(name="Lehrmittelverlag ZΓΌrich AG")
Claude: β
Lehrmittelverlag ZΓΌrich AG is ACTIVE in the Handelsregister.
UID: CHE-404.020.972 | Canton: ZH | Legal form: AG
Last SHAB mutation: 2023-07-27
```
[β More use cases by audience β](EXAMPLES.md)
To generate the demo GIF locally:
```bash
# Install vhs (macOS/Linux)
brew install vhs # macOS
# or: go install github.com/charmbracelet/vhs@latest
# Generate
vhs docs/demo/demo.tape
# β outputs docs/demo/demo.gif
```
---
## MCP Protocol Version
This server speaks **two protocol eras** over the same endpoint. The client's
first request on a connection decides which one applies; a later claim from the
other era is refused.
| Era | Revision | Who reaches it |
|---|---|---|
| `initialize` handshake | `2024-11-05` β¦ **`2025-11-25`** | What today's clients speak. The server answers with the revision asked for, or with the `2025-11-25` ceiling when the request asks for something newer. |
| Per-request envelope | **`2026-07-28`** | A request carrying the `2026-07-28` `_meta` envelope opens a modern connection. Over HTTP only via `streamable-http` (`POST /mcp` with `MCP-Protocol-Version` and `Mcp-Method` headers); SSE does not reach it. |
Both revisions are pinned in
[`tests/test_protocol_version.py`](tests/test_protocol_version.py) and asserted
against the installed SDK, so a Dependabot bump of `mcp` cannot move either one
silently. [`tests/test_streamable_http.py`](tests/test_streamable_http.py)
measures both on the wire: it sends `server/discover`, `tools/list` and
`tools/call` as `2026-07-28` requests and an `initialize` asking for a future
revision through the app `main()` serves, and reads the responses. The CI
`docker` job sends the same `tools/list` to the running image.
Note that the SDK's `LATEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION` is an alias for the **modern**
era, not for the handshake era β pinning against it alone would leave the era
that current clients actually negotiate free to drift.
**Update policy.** When the gate fails, do not edit the constant blindly: read
the spec changelog between the two revisions, verify the server still behaves,
then move the constant, this section, `README.de.md` and
[`CHANGELOG.md`](CHANGELOG.md) together.
---
## Testing
```bash
# Unit tests (no API key required)
PYTHONPATH=src pytest tests/ -m "not live"
# Integration tests (live API calls)
pytest tests/ -m "live"
# Re-record the fixtures from the live sources (writes tests/fixtures/PROVENANCE.md)
python scripts/record_fixtures.py
```
The unit-test payloads are **recorded, not invented**. Source, retrieval date,
selection rule, **redaction** and SHA-256 per file are in
[`tests/fixtures/PROVENANCE.md`](tests/fixtures/PROVENANCE.md).
Two things are stated there rather than papered over. **Personal data:** the
gazette carries debt-collection notices and Zefix carries the full SHAB text
naming registered persons with their place of residence β the recorded payloads
keep the shape and redact those values, with the complete list of redacted
fields alongside. **Zefix needs no credentials:** until 2026-08-08 this
repository recorded no Zefix fixtures because the recording script measured
HTTP 401. The measurement was right about the wrong address β the script asked
`ZefixPublicREST`, while the server speaks to `ZefixREST`, which answers with no
authentication at all.
### The live suite
`ci.yml` runs `-m "not live"`: a foreign 503 must not redden a stranger's pull
request, because a suite that does gets switched off, and a switched-off suite
checks nothing. The exclusion has a safety net β
[`.github/workflows/live-tests.yml`](.github/workflows/live-tests.yml) runs
weekly (`cron: "31 5 * * 1"`) plus `workflow_dispatch`.
The verdict is read from the JUnit XML rather than the exit code, by
[`scripts/classify_live_run.py`](scripts/classify_live_run.py), because a live
run has three answers and not two:
| State | Meaning | Issue |
|---|---|---|
| `clear` | the suite ran and was green | closes an open one |
| `finding` | the suite ran and something fell | opens or updates one |
| `unknown` | the suite did **not** run β failed install, timeout, renamed marker, everything skipped | left untouched |
`tests - skipped == 0` is `unknown`, not `clear`: pytest exits 0 when every test
was skipped, and a job that books that as green closes an issue on a comparison
that never happened.
One caveat when editing that workflow: the pull-request checks do **not** cover
it β it has no `push` or `pull_request` trigger, so a green PR says nothing about
it. Verify changes with a manual `workflow_dispatch` run on the branch *before*
merging.
---
## Changelog
See [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md)
---
## Contributing
See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md)
---
## Security
See [SECURITY.md](SECURITY.md) ([Deutsch](SECURITY.de.md)) for the security
posture and how to report a vulnerability.
---
## License
MIT License β see [LICENSE](LICENSE)
---
## Author
Hayal Oezkan Β· [malkreide](https://github.com/malkreide)
---
## Credits & Related Projects
- **Zefix:** [zefix.admin.ch](https://www.zefix.admin.ch/) β Swiss Federal Commercial Register (BJ/FOJ)
- **Amtsblattportal:** [amtsblattportal.ch](https://amtsblattportal.ch/) β SHAB and cantonal gazettes (SECO / Swiss Confederation)
- **Protocol:** [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/) β Anthropic / Linux Foundation
- **Related:** [fedlex-mcp](https://github.com/malkreide/fedlex-mcp) β Commercial register ordinance (HRegV)
- **Related:** [zurich-opendata-mcp](https://github.com/malkreide/zurich-opendata-mcp) β Company seat + geodata
- **Related:** [swiss-statistics-mcp](https://github.com/malkreide/swiss-statistics-mcp) β Industry statistics by NOGA
- **Related:** [swiss-snb-mcp](https://github.com/malkreide/swiss-snb-mcp) β Economic indicators
- **Portfolio:** [Swiss Public Data MCP Portfolio](https://github.com/malkreide)
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.malkreide/register-mcp -->
<!-- BEGIN GENERATED: install -->
## Installation
Run via [`uv`](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/)'s `uvx` β no clone or manual install needed. Add to your MCP client config (`mcpServers` for Claude Desktop, Cursor and Windsurf; use a top-level `servers` key for VS Code in `.vscode/mcp.json`):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"register-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"register-mcp"
]
}
}
}
```
<!-- END GENERATED: install -->
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool addresses a distinct task: company search, company detail by internal ID, company detail by UID, verification, legal form/municipality lookups, gazette publications, publication full text, and source status. The two get_company variants are clearly differentiated by their lookup key, and the descriptions explain exactly when to use each.
The zefix_ tools consistently follow a verb_noun pattern, which is clear and predictable. The gazette_ tools are less uniform: gazette_get_publication uses a verb, while gazette_company_publications and gazette_source_status are noun-style names, but the shared namespace prefix keeps them recognizable.
With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose: covering Swiss register lookups and gazette publications without unnecessary redundancy. Each tool earns its place in the workflow, from company discovery through verification to publication detail retrieval.
The set covers the full read-only lifecycle of a Swiss company lookup: search, verify, get by ID or UID, resolve legal forms and municipalities, then retrieve gazette publications and individual full texts. The intentional lack of a person-search entry point is documented and does not represent a gap for the stated corporate-register scope.