news_alert_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description states alerts are persistent and survive server restarts, adding behavioral detail beyond annotations (which only set readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false). It also explains the return format (confirmation with alert ID). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is fairly concise, but the Args section and condition type list could be more streamlined. Some redundancy (e.g., condition types repeated). Not overly long but could be better structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of sibling tools and output schema (return string with alert ID), coverage is adequate but not exhaustive. Missing details on default values, error cases, or prerequisites. The life cycle (create -> check) is hinted but not fully explained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% per context, so description must compensate. It lists parameter names and explains condition types well, but omits details for parameters like language, source_country, days_back. Schema itself has descriptions for some fields, but description adds marginal value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with 'Erstellt einen neuen News-Alert' clearly specifying creation action and resource. Sibling tools include news_alert_list, news_alert_check, news_alert_delete, so this tool is unambiguously the creation tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions that news_alert_check checks alerts against current data, implying a workflow. However, does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., news_sentiment_monitor for continuous monitoring). Condition types are described but usage context is minimal.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.