tracepass-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to tracepass-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for embedding and verifying C2PA content credentials (provenance) in AI-generated assets, with HMAC-based tamper-evident manifests and optional X.509 support, helping comply with EU AI Act Article 50.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for GoCertius: certified evidence, dossiers, notifications and chats via AI agents.4164 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTamper-evident audit trail MCP server for EU AI Act and GDPR compliance. It enables logging events with automatic PII scanning, compliance checks, and right-to-erasure support.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, running entirely on your infrastructure with Ed25519 cryptographic signing for every action.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for French Electronic Invoicing (NF XP Z12-013). Provide tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for PDP/OD interoperability.34Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA hosted remote MCP server for verifying C2PA intakes, classifying source risk, issuing media receipts, and exporting intake logs. Designed for AI governance, trust and safety, and compliance teams.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
The seven top-level tools map to clearly distinct domains: product catalogue, passport lifecycle, passport fields, economic-operator parties, EPCIS events, template schemas, and legal scope. Boundary risk is mostly inside tracepass_passports, whose many paired *_by_serial actions overlap conceptually with their by-id siblings, though the descriptions explicitly disambiguate (serial uniqueness, 409 ambiguous_serial, GTIN disambiguation).
All tools share the tracepass_ prefix and a consistent resource-noun layout, with actions expressed uniformly as verbs via the action parameter. Minor deviations: plural 'products'/'passports' vs singular 'passport_fields'/'passport_parties', and parties uses set/remove while fields uses update, but the pattern is still highly predictable.
Seven top-level tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a DPP platform and each tool earns its place. However tracepass_passports concentrates roughly 25 actions (list/get/QR/snapshots/condition flags/measurements/compliance/registry/place_on_market plus many *_by_serial variants), making that one tool disproportionately heavy.
The surface covers products, passport create/read/lifecycle, field updates, parties, EPCIS capture/query/export, templates, and scope checking, which is broad lifecycle coverage. Gaps remain: publishing is explicitly out of band (dashboard only), products have archive but no unarchive, and parties offer set/remove but no dedicated read action.