tracepass-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to tracepass-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for embedding and verifying C2PA content credentials (provenance) in AI-generated assets, with HMAC-based tamper-evident manifests and optional X.509 support, helping comply with EU AI Act Article 50.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for GoCertius: certified evidence, dossiers, notifications and chats via AI agents.41148 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTamper-evident audit trail MCP server for EU AI Act and GDPR compliance. It enables logging events with automatic PII scanning, compliance checks, and right-to-erasure support.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, running entirely on your infrastructure with Ed25519 cryptographic signing for every action.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for French Electronic Invoicing (NF XP Z12-013). Provide tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for PDP/OD interoperability.234Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA hosted remote MCP server for verifying C2PA intakes, classifying source risk, issuing media receipts, and exporting intake logs. Designed for AI governance, trust and safety, and compliance teams.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct domain: passports, products, passport fields, parties, EPCIS events, and templates. Even within passports, actions like compliance and get_qr are clearly separated from basic CRUD, and _by_serial variants are explicitly scoped to avoid ambiguity.
All tools follow the consistent pattern tracepass_<resource> with snake_case, and actions use predictable verb prefixes (list, get, create, update, archive, etc.). The naming is uniform and easily navigable.
Six tools is within the ideal 3-15 range, and each tool addresses a clear functional area of DPP management. The count feels neither bloated nor sparse for the server's purpose.
The surface covers the core DPP workflow: product CRUD, passport lifecycle (create/read/suspend/archive), field updates, party management, EPCIS capture/query/export, and regulatory schema reference. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit reactivation from suspension and immutable passport-level metadata, but these are likely intentional design constraints.