Skip to main content
Glama
mako10k

MCP-Confirm

by mako10k
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-Confirm

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • call-a-human-mcp

      nishantmodak
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to pause and request human approval or information via Slack, Telegram, or macOS dialogs before proceeding with actions.
      2
      15
      Apache 2.0

    • Popup MCP

      Chietears
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A cross-platform MCP server that provides native popup windows for AI agents to gather user feedback, input, and safety confirmations. It enables agents to present interactive questionnaires and secure confirmation prompts for sensitive operations like file deletion or code execution.
      13
      MIT

    • data_sync_mcp

      Mengzuqing
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to request user feedback during tasks, reducing wasted API calls. Optimized for data sync workflows with tools for audience sync confirmation, DMP verification, and rollback confirmation.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. For example, ask_yes_no handles simple binary questions, clarify_intent addresses ambiguous requests, confirm_action verifies impactful operations, and verify_understanding checks comprehension—all serving different confirmation needs without overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear, descriptive names. Examples include analyze_logs, search_logs, collect_rating, and verify_understanding, maintaining uniformity throughout the set without any deviations in style or structure.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for handling user confirmation and verification tasks. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects like questioning, clarification, logging, and feedback, avoiding both bloat and insufficiency.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for the confirmation domain, including standard confirmations (ask_yes_no, confirm_action), intent handling (clarify_intent, verify_understanding), feedback collection (collect_rating), logging (analyze_logs, search_logs), and customization (elicit_custom), with no apparent gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources